Vesnaver G, Breslauer K J
Department of Chemistry, Rutgers State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick 08903.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 May 1;88(9):3569-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.9.3569.
We report a direct determination of the thermodynamic contribution that DNA single-stranded order makes to DNA duplex formation. By using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and temperature-dependent UV absorbance spectroscopy, we have characterized thermodynamically the thermally induced disruption of the 13-mer duplex [d(CGCATGAGTACGC)].[d(GCGTACTCATGCG)] (henceforth called S1.S2) and its component single strands, [d(CGCATGAGTACGC)] (henceforth called S1) and [d(GCGTACTCATGCG)] (henceforth called S2). These spectroscopic and calorimetric measurements yield the following thermodynamic profiles at 25 degrees C: delta G degree = 20.0 kcal/mol, delta H degree = 117.0 kcal/mol, and delta S degree = 325.4 cal.degree-1.mol-1 for duplex melting of S1.S2; delta G degree = 0.45 kcal/mol, delta H degrees = 29.1 kcal/mol, and delta S degree = 96.1 cal.degree-1.mol-1 for single-strand melting of S1; delta G degree = 1.44 kcal/mol, delta H degree = 27.2 kcal/mol, and delta S degree = 86.4 cal.degree-1.mol-1 for single-strand melting of S2 (1 cal = 4.184 J). These data reveal that the two single-stranded structures S1 and S2 are only marginally stable at 25 degrees C, despite exhibiting rather substantial transition enthalpies. This behavior results from enthalpy and entropy contributions of similar magnitudes that compensate each other, thereby giving rise to relatively small free energies of stabilization for the single strands at 25 degrees C. By contrast, the S1.S2 duplex state is very stable at 25 degrees C since the favorable transition entropy associated with duplex disruption (325.4 cal.degree-1.mol-1) is more than compensated for by the extremely large duplex transition enthalpy (117.0 kcal/mol). We also measured directly an enthalpy change (delta H degree) of -56.4 kcal/mol for duplex formation at 25 degrees C using isothermal batch-mixing calorimetry. This duplex formation enthalpy of -56.4 kcal/mol at 25 degrees C is very different in magnitude from the duplex disruption enthalpy of 117.0 kcal/mol measured at 74 degrees C by DSC. Since the DSC measurement reveals the net transition heat capacity change to be close to zero, we interpret this large disparity between the enthalpies of duplex disruption and duplex formation as reflecting differences in the single-stranded structures at 25 degrees C (the initial states in the isothermal mixing experiment) and the single-stranded structures at approximately 80 degrees C (the final states in the DSC experiment). In fact, the enthalpy for duplex formation at 25 degree C (-56.4 kcal/mol) can be combined with the sum of the integral enthalpies requires to melt each single strand from 25 to 80 degree C (23.6 kcal/mol for S1 and 27.2 kcal/mol for S2) to calculate a delta H degree of -107.2 kcal/mol for the hypothetical process of duplex formation from "random-coil" "unstacked" single strands at 25 degree C. The magnitude of this predicted delta H degree value for duplex formation is in good agreement with the corresponding parameter we measure directly by DSC for duplex disruption (117.0 kcal/mol), thereby lending credence to our interpretation and analysis of the data. Thus, our results demonstrate that despite being only marginally stable at 25 degree C, single strands can exhibit intramolecular interactions that enthalpically poise them for duplex formation. For the duplex studied herein, prior to association at 25 degree C, the two complementary single strands already possess > 40% of the total enthalpy (50.8/117) that ultimately stabilizes the final duplex state. This feature of single-stranded structure near room temperature can reduce significantly the enthalpic driving force one might predict for duplex formation from nearest-neighbor data, since such data generally are derived from measurements in which the single strands are in their random-coil states. Consequently, potential contributions from single-stranded structure must be recognized and accounted for when designing hybridization experiments and when using isothermal titration and/or batch mixing techniques to study the formation of duplexes and higher-order DNA structures (e.g., triplexes, tetraplexes, etc.) from their component single strands.
我们报告了对DNA单链有序结构对DNA双链形成的热力学贡献的直接测定。通过使用差示扫描量热法(DSC)和温度依赖性紫外吸收光谱,我们从热力学角度表征了13聚体双链体[d(CGCATGAGTACGC)].[d(GCGTACTCATGCG)](以下简称S1.S2)及其组成单链[d(CGCATGAGTACGC)](以下简称S1)和[d(GCGTACTCATGCG)](以下简称S2)的热诱导解链。这些光谱和量热测量在25℃时得到以下热力学曲线:S1.S2双链体解链的ΔG° = 20.0 kcal/mol,ΔH° = 117.0 kcal/mol,ΔS° = 325.4 cal·°C⁻¹·mol⁻¹;S1单链解链的ΔG° = 0.45 kcal/mol,ΔH° = 29.1 kcal/mol,ΔS° = 96.1 cal·°C⁻¹·mol⁻¹;S2单链解链的ΔG° = 1.44 kcal/mol,ΔH° = 27.2 kcal/mol,ΔS° = 86.4 cal·°C⁻¹·mol⁻¹(1 cal = 4.184 J)。这些数据表明,尽管单链结构S1和S2在25℃时表现出相当大的转变焓,但其稳定性仅处于边缘状态。这种行为是由大小相似的焓和熵贡献相互补偿导致的,从而使得单链在25℃时具有相对较小的稳定自由能。相比之下,S1.S2双链体状态在25℃时非常稳定,因为与双链解链相关的有利转变熵(325.4 cal·°C⁻¹·mol⁻¹)被极大的双链转变焓(117.0 kcal/mol)充分补偿。我们还使用等温批量混合量热法直接测量了25℃时双链形成的焓变(ΔH°)为 -56.4 kcal/mol。25℃时 -56.4 kcal/mol的双链形成焓与DSC在74℃测量的117.0 kcal/mol的双链解链焓在大小上有很大差异。由于DSC测量显示净转变热容量变化接近零,我们将双链解链焓和双链形成焓之间的这种巨大差异解释为反映了25℃时(等温混合实验中的初始状态)和大约80℃时(DSC实验中的最终状态)单链结构的差异。实际上,25℃时双链形成的焓( -56.4 kcal/mol)可以与将每条单链从25℃加热到80℃所需的积分焓之和(S1为23.6 kcal/mol,S2为27.2 kcal/mol)相结合,以计算从25℃时“无规卷曲”“未堆积”单链形成双链的假设过程的ΔH°为 -107.2 kcal/mol。这个预测的双链形成ΔH°值的大小与我们通过DSC直接测量的双链解链相应参数(117.0 kcal/mol)非常吻合,从而证实了我们对数据的解释和分析。因此,我们的结果表明,尽管单链在25℃时仅处于边缘稳定状态,但它们可以表现出分子内相互作用,这些相互作用在焓的层面上使它们为双链形成做好准备。对于本文研究的双链体,在25℃结合之前,两条互补单链已经拥有最终稳定双链状态总焓(50.8/117)的> 40%。室温附近单链结构的这一特征可以显著降低根据最近邻数据预测的双链形成的焓驱动力,因为此类数据通常来自单链处于无规卷曲状态的测量。因此,在设计杂交实验以及使用等温滴定和/或批量混合技术研究由其组成单链形成双链和高阶DNA结构(如三链体、四链体等)时,必须认识并考虑单链结构的潜在贡献。