Suppr超能文献

基于医院和私立门诊物理治疗实践的比较。

A comparison of hospital-based and private outpatient physical therapy practices.

作者信息

Jette A M, Davis K D

机构信息

New England Research Institute Inc, Watertown, MA 02172.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 1991 May;71(5):366-75; discussion 376-81. doi: 10.1093/ptj/71.5.366.

Abstract

A paucity of data exists about the delivery of contemporary adult outpatient physical therapy services in the United States. Although many debates about this issue have taken place within the physical therapy profession, assumptions about practice patterns have generally not been studied. This article reports some of the first-year findings from a 3-year survey research effort begun in September 1988 by Mathematica Policy Research Inc for the American Physical Therapy Association. Analyses are based on survey data from national probability samples of physical therapy facilities and discharged patients from 155 hospital-based and 166 private outpatient practices. The primary goal was to compare outpatient physical therapy practice patterns in the hospital-based and private practice settings. Findings reveal considerable homogeneity in private and hospital-based outpatient physical therapy practices. Hospital-based and private practices serve predominantly young, white adults who have private health insurance and a prevalence of orthopedic impairments. In both settings, direct access to outpatient physical therapy services was the exception and not the rule. Even in states in which direct access without a physician's referral was permitted by law, the majority of outpatient physical therapy was provided with a physician's referral. Most respondents in direct-access states indicated that reimbursement requirements were the major reason for needing a physician's referral to provide outpatient physical therapy.

摘要

关于美国当代成人门诊物理治疗服务的提供情况,现有数据匮乏。尽管物理治疗行业内部已就此问题展开诸多辩论,但对实践模式的假设通常尚未得到研究。本文报告了Mathematica政策研究公司于1988年9月为美国物理治疗协会开展的一项为期3年的调查研究第一年的部分结果。分析基于对物理治疗机构以及155家医院门诊和166家私人门诊的出院患者进行全国概率抽样所得的调查数据。主要目标是比较医院门诊和私人门诊的物理治疗实践模式。研究结果显示,医院门诊和私人门诊的物理治疗实践存在相当大的同质性。医院门诊和私人门诊的主要服务对象是拥有私人医疗保险且普遍存在骨科损伤的年轻白人成年人。在这两种情况下,直接获得门诊物理治疗服务都是例外而非惯例。即使在法律允许无需医生转诊即可直接就诊的州,大多数门诊物理治疗仍是在有医生转诊的情况下提供的。直接就诊州的大多数受访者表示,报销要求是需要医生转诊才能提供门诊物理治疗的主要原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验