US Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Dec;44(12):955-63. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5224. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
Retrospective analysis of episodes of care.
To assess the implications of practice setting (hospital outpatient settings versus private practice) on clinical outcomes and efficiency of care in the delivery of physical therapy services.
Many patients with musculoskeletal conditions benefit from care provided by physical therapists. The majority of physical therapists deliver services in either a private practice setting or in a hospital outpatient setting. There have not been any recent studies comparing whether clinical outcomes or efficiency of care differ based on practice setting.
Practices that use the Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc system were surveyed to determine the specific type of setting in which outcomes were collected in patients with musculoskeletal impairments. Patient outcome data over 12 months (2011-2012) were extracted from the database and analyzed to identify differences in the functional status achieved and the efficiency of the care delivery process between private practices and hospital outpatient settings.
The data suggest that patients experience more efficient care when receiving physical therapy in hospital outpatient settings compared to private practice settings, as demonstrated by 3.1 points of greater improvement in functional status over 2.9 fewer physical therapy visits. However, the difference in improvement between settings is less than the minimum clinically important difference of 9 points in functional status outcome score.
In this cohort, our data suggest that more efficient care was delivered in the hospital outpatient setting compared to the private practice setting. However, we cannot conclude that care delivered in the hospital setting is more cost-effective, because it is possible that any difference in efficiency of care favoring the hospital outpatient setting is more than offset by higher costs of care.
回顾性护理分析。
评估实践环境(医院门诊环境与私人诊所)对物理治疗服务提供中临床结果和护理效率的影响。
许多肌肉骨骼疾病患者从物理治疗师提供的护理中受益。大多数物理治疗师在私人诊所或医院门诊环境中提供服务。最近没有任何研究比较基于实践环境的临床结果或护理效率是否存在差异。
对使用 Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc 系统的实践进行了调查,以确定在肌肉骨骼功能障碍患者中收集结果的具体环境类型。从数据库中提取了 12 个月(2011-2012 年)的患者结果数据,并进行分析,以确定私人诊所和医院门诊环境之间在实现功能状态和护理提供过程效率方面的差异。
数据表明,与私人诊所环境相比,患者在医院门诊环境中接受物理治疗时获得了更高效的护理,表现在功能状态方面改善了 3.1 分,而物理治疗就诊次数减少了 2.9 次。然而,这种治疗效果在设置间的差异小于功能状态结果评分的 9 分的最小临床重要差异。
在本队列中,我们的数据表明,与私人诊所环境相比,医院门诊环境提供了更高效的护理。然而,我们不能得出医院环境提供的护理更具成本效益的结论,因为医院门诊环境对护理效率的任何优势都有可能被更高的护理成本所抵消。