Haladay Douglas, Swisher Laura, Hardwick Dustin
School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine Tampa Florida USA.
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 22;4(3):e378. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.378. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Goal attainment scaling (GAS) has been widely applied to chronic conditions; however, only recently has it been used for patients with low back pain (LBP). The objectives of this systematic review were to (a) examine the characteristics and rigor of published studies of GAS in the rehabilitation of patients with LBP, (b) describe how GAS has been applied in patients with LBP, and (c) evaluate the responsiveness and validity of GAS as an outcome measure in patients with LBP.
A systematic search of the CINAHL, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases was performed (1968 and 1 September 2020) in addition to hand searching. Studies including GAS procedures in patients with LBP during rehabilitation were included in the review. Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion and determined levels of evidence using the Oxford Levels of Evidence and rated each study for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and reporting transparency using the STROBE statement checklist.
Six Level IV and one Level III/IV study were included in this review (search produced 248 studies for review). These studies assessed GAS feasibility, validity, sensitivity, and association with other outcome measures in patients with LBP. Findings suggest that patients with LBP are able to identify and set individualized goals during GAS, while GAS may be more sensitive to change and may measure different aspects of the patient experience as compared with fixed-item patient-reported measures. Additionally, GAS may have a therapeutic effect while improving patient outcomes and may be associated with patient satisfaction.
Based on this review, GAS shows promise as a feasible patient-centered measure that may be more responsive to change than traditional outcome measures. However, GAS has been inadequately developed and validated for use during rehabilitation in patients with LBP.
目标达成量表(GAS)已广泛应用于慢性病;然而,直到最近才被用于腰痛(LBP)患者。本系统评价的目的是:(a)检查已发表的关于GAS在LBP患者康复中的研究的特征和严谨性;(b)描述GAS在LBP患者中的应用方式;(c)评估GAS作为LBP患者结局指标的反应性和有效性。
除手工检索外,还对CINAHL、PubMed和MEDLINE数据库进行了系统检索(检索时间为1968年至2020年9月1日)。纳入的研究包括在康复期间对LBP患者采用GAS程序的研究。两位作者独立选择纳入研究,并使用牛津证据水平确定证据水平,使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对每项研究的质量进行评分,并使用STROBE声明清单对报告透明度进行评分。
本评价纳入了6项IV级研究和1项III/IV级研究(检索共得到248项研究以供评价)。这些研究评估了GAS在LBP患者中的可行性、有效性、敏感性以及与其他结局指标的相关性。研究结果表明,LBP患者在GAS过程中能够识别并设定个体化目标,与固定项目的患者报告指标相比,GAS可能对变化更敏感,并且可以衡量患者体验的不同方面。此外,GAS在改善患者结局的同时可能具有治疗作用,并且可能与患者满意度相关。
基于本评价,GAS显示出作为一种可行的以患者为中心的测量方法的前景,它可能比传统结局指标对变化更敏感。然而,GAS在LBP患者康复中的开发和验证尚不充分。