Cassidy V R
Northern Illinois University School of Nursing, DeKalb 60115.
J Prof Nurs. 1991 Mar-Apr;7(2):112-8. doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(91)90095-3.
Discussions in the literature assert that nurses are becoming increasingly cognizant of their ethical responsibilities, but that they are often ill prepared to participate in ethical decision making. A review of selected research literature from 1970 to 1987 was undertaken to validate these assertions. A total of 12 studies related to ethical responsibilities was identified in the review; all studies were published between 1980 and 1987. The majority of studies were at the descriptive and exploratory levels and employed Kohlberg's cognitive theory of moral development as their conceptual framework. Significant findings related to educational level and ethical responsibilities were consistent across studies. Findings related to age and clinical experience were mixed; the effects of economic level, religion-religiosity, ethnicity, and other variables on ethical responsibilities were not significant. Issues raised in the light of the existing research include the use of Kohlberg's theory as a conceptual orientation in nursing groups and limited data on the reliability and validity of instruments used in measuring ethical constructs. Recommendations for future research on ethical responsibilities include the validation of Kohlberg's theory for nursing investigations, exploration of other frameworks for developing a multidimensional view of ethical responsibilities, and the use of qualitative research designs.
文献中的讨论认为,护士越来越意识到自己的道德责任,但他们往往没有做好参与道德决策的准备。为了验证这些观点,对1970年至1987年的部分研究文献进行了综述。在该综述中总共确定了12项与道德责任相关的研究;所有研究均发表于1980年至1987年之间。大多数研究处于描述性和探索性水平,并采用科尔伯格的道德发展认知理论作为其概念框架。各项研究中与教育水平和道德责任相关的重要发现是一致的。与年龄和临床经验相关的发现则喜忧参半;经济水平、宗教虔诚度、种族以及其他变量对道德责任的影响并不显著。根据现有研究提出的问题包括将科尔伯格的理论用作护理群体的概念导向,以及用于衡量道德构念的工具在可靠性和有效性方面的数据有限。对未来道德责任研究的建议包括验证科尔伯格的理论以用于护理调查、探索其他框架以形成对道德责任的多维看法,以及采用定性研究设计。