Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Neurosci Lett. 2010 May 26;476(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.03.032. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
Humans differ in their initial response to, and subsequent abuse of, addictive drugs like cocaine. Rodents also exhibit marked individual differences in responsiveness to cocaine. Previously, we classified male Sprague-Dawley rats as either low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively), based on their acute low-dose cocaine-induced locomotor activity, and found that with repeated drug exposure LCRs exhibit greater cocaine locomotor sensitization, reward and reinforcement than HCRs. Differential cocaine-induced increases in striatal dopamine help to explain the LCR/HCR phenotypes. Differential levels of stress and/or anxiety could also contribute but have not been explored. Here we measured open-field activity and plasma corticosterone levels both pre- and post-cocaine treatment in LCRs, HCRs, and saline-treated controls. The three groups did not differ in baseline locomotor activity or corticosterone levels. Importantly, LCR/HCR differences in corticosterone levels were also not observed following acute cocaine (10mg/kg, i.p.), when cocaine induced approximately 3.5-fold greater locomotor activity in HCRs than LCRs. Additionally, there were no LCR/HCR differences in plasma corticosterone levels following 5 days of once-daily cocaine, during which time LCRs developed locomotor sensitization such that their cocaine-induced locomotor activity no longer differed from that of HCRs. Likewise, there were no group activity differences in any of four concentric zones within the open-field chamber. In summary, neither plasma corticosterone levels nor thigmotaxis-type anxiety appears to be a factor that contributes to the observed cocaine-induced LCR/HCR behavioral differences.
人类对可卡因等成瘾性药物的初始反应和随后的滥用存在个体差异。啮齿动物对可卡因的反应也表现出明显的个体差异。此前,我们根据雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠对急性低剂量可卡因诱导的运动活动的反应,将其分为低或高可卡因反应者(LCR 或 HCR),并发现随着反复药物暴露,LCR 表现出更强的可卡因运动敏化、奖赏和强化作用,而 HCR 则表现出更强的可卡因运动敏化、奖赏和强化作用。纹状体多巴胺的差异增加有助于解释 LCR/HCR 表型。不同水平的压力和/或焦虑也可能有贡献,但尚未得到探索。在这里,我们在 LCR、HCR 和盐水处理的对照组中测量了可卡因治疗前后的旷场活动和血浆皮质酮水平。三组在基线运动活动或皮质酮水平上没有差异。重要的是,在急性可卡因(10mg/kg,ip)处理后,LCR 和 HCR 之间也没有观察到皮质酮水平的 LCR/HCR 差异,当可卡因诱导 HCR 的运动活动增加约 3.5 倍时。此外,在每天一次可卡因治疗 5 天后,LCR 发展出运动敏化,导致其可卡因诱导的运动活动不再与 HCR 不同,但 LCR 和 HCR 之间的血浆皮质酮水平也没有差异。同样,在开放场室的四个同心区域内,LCR 和 HCR 之间也没有组间活动差异。总之,血浆皮质酮水平或壁回避型焦虑似乎都不是导致观察到的可卡因诱导的 LCR/HCR 行为差异的因素。