La Cesta Consultants, L.L.C., Miami, FL 33157, USA.
Account Res. 2010 Mar;17(2):96-113. doi: 10.1080/08989621003708493.
Declassification of documents has given rise to the allegation that the Central Intelligence Agency may have conducted unethical research targeting detainee subjects. That allegation is examined using document analysis and the development of research goals and roles as defined in the Common Rule. This article sets aside issues as to whether enhanced interrogation techniques described in the declassified documents rise to legal definitions of torture. Instead, it presents a post hoc ethics review raising questions addressed by Institutional Review Boards recommending the filing of a for-cause noncompliance complaint with the Office for Human Research Protection against the Central Intelligence Agency.
文件的解密引发了指控,称中央情报局可能针对被拘留者进行了不道德的研究。本文使用文献分析和《普通规则》中定义的研究目标和角色来审查这一指控。本文不讨论解密文件中描述的强化审讯技术是否属于法律定义的酷刑,而是进行事后伦理审查,提出机构审查委员会提出的问题,建议对中央情报局提起非合规投诉。