Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Mar 22;10:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-149.
In India, indigenous populations, known as Adivasi or Scheduled Tribes (STs), are among the poorest and most marginalized groups. 'Deprived' ST groups tend to display high levels of resignation and to lack the capacity to aspire; consequently their health perceptions often do not adequately correspond to their real health needs. Moreover, similar to indigenous populations elsewhere, STs often have little opportunity to voice perspectives framed within their own cultural worldviews. We undertook a study to gather policy-relevant data on the views, experiences, and priorities of a marginalized and previously enslaved tribal group in South India, the Paniyas, who have little 'voice' or power over their own situation.
METHODS/DESIGN: We implemented a Participatory Poverty and Health Assessment (PPHA). We adopted guiding principles and an ethical code that promote respect for Paniya culture and values. The PPHA, informed by a vulnerability framework, addressed five key themes (health and illness, well-being, institutions, education, gender) using participatory approaches and qualitative methods. We implemented the PPHA in five Paniya colonies (clusters of houses in a small geographical area) in a gram panchayat (lowest level decentralized territorial unit) to generate data that can be quickly disseminated to decision-makers through interactive workshops and public forums. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS: Findings indicated that the Paniyas are caught in multiple 'vulnerability traps', that is, they view their situation as vicious cycles from which it is difficult to break free.
The PPHA is a potentially useful approach for global health researchers working with marginalized communities to implement research initiatives that will address those communities' health needs in an ethical and culturally appropriate manner.
在印度,原住民群体,被称为阿迪瓦西或在册部落(ST),是最贫穷和最边缘化的群体之一。“贫困”的 ST 群体往往表现出高度的顺从,缺乏渴望的能力;因此,他们的健康观念往往不能充分反映他们的实际健康需求。此外,与其他地方的原住民一样,ST 往往没有机会表达自己的观点,而这些观点是基于他们自己的文化世界观的。我们进行了一项研究,以收集有关印度南部一个边缘化和曾经被奴役的部落群体——帕尼亚人的观点、经验和优先事项的政策相关数据,他们对自己的处境几乎没有“发言权”或权力。
方法/设计:我们实施了参与式贫困和健康评估(PPHA)。我们采用了指导原则和道德准则,促进了对帕尼亚文化和价值观的尊重。PPHA 以脆弱性框架为指导,通过参与式方法和定性方法,探讨了五个关键主题(健康和疾病、福祉、机构、教育、性别)。我们在一个 Gram Panchayat(最低级别的分散领土单位)的五个帕尼亚人殖民地(一个小地理区域内的房屋集群)中实施了 PPHA,以生成可以通过互动研讨会和公共论坛快速传播给决策者的数据。初步发现:研究结果表明,帕尼亚人陷入了多个“脆弱性陷阱”,也就是说,他们认为自己的处境是很难摆脱的恶性循环。
PPHA 是全球健康研究人员与边缘化社区合作的一种潜在有用的方法,可以以符合伦理和文化的方式实施研究计划,以满足这些社区的健康需求。