• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

垃圾渗滤液对柳树——垂柳的植物毒性

Phytotoxicity of landfill leachate on willow--Salix amygdalina L.

机构信息

The University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Department of Environmental Biotechnology, ul. Sloneczna 45 G, 10-900 Olsztyn, Poland.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2010 Aug-Sep;30(8-9):1587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.033. Epub 2010 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.033
PMID:20307964
Abstract

Because of low investment and operational costs, interest is increasing in the use of willow plants in landfill leachate disposal. Toxic effects of leachate on the plants should be avoided in the initial period of growth and phytotoxicological testing may be helpful to select appropriate leachate dose rates. The aim of this study was to determine the phytotoxicity of landfill leachate on young willow (Salix amygdalina L.) cuttings, as a criterion for dose rate selection in the early phase of growth. Over a test period of 6 weeks plants were exposed to six concentrations of landfill leachate solutions (0%; 6.25%; 12.5%; 25%; 50% and 100%), under two different regimes. In regime A willow plants were cultivated in leachate solution from the beginning, whereas in regime B they were grown initially in clean water for 4 weeks, after which the water was exchanged for leachate solutions. The lowest effective concentration causing toxic effects (LOEC) was calculated (p<0.05). In regime A LOEC was between 5.44% and 6.50% of leachate concentration, but slightly higher in regime B (5.32-6.59%). Willow plants were able to survive in landfill leachate solutions with electrical conductivity (EC) values up to 5.0 mS/cm in regime A, whereas in regime B plants were killed when EC exceeded 3.0 mS/cm. This indicates an ability of willow plants to tolerate higher strengths of landfill leachate if they are cultivated in such concentrations from the beginning.

摘要

由于投资和运营成本低,利用柳树植物处理垃圾渗滤液的兴趣日益增加。在生长的初始阶段,应避免渗滤液对植物的毒性影响,而植物的植物毒性测试可能有助于选择合适的渗滤液剂量率。本研究的目的是确定垃圾渗滤液对幼柳(Salix amygdalina L.)插条的植物毒性,作为生长初期选择剂量率的标准。在 6 周的测试期内,植物暴露于六种浓度的垃圾渗滤液溶液(0%;6.25%;12.5%;25%;50%和 100%)下,有两种不同的处理方式。在 A 处理方式中,柳树植物从一开始就种植在渗滤液溶液中,而在 B 处理方式中,它们最初在干净的水中生长 4 周,然后将水换成渗滤液溶液。计算出引起毒性作用的最低有效浓度(LOEC)(p<0.05)。在 A 处理方式中,LOEC 在渗滤液浓度的 5.44%和 6.50%之间,但在 B 处理方式中略高(5.32-6.59%)。柳树植物在 A 处理方式中能够在电导率(EC)值高达 5.0 mS/cm 的垃圾渗滤液溶液中存活,而在 B 处理方式中,当 EC 超过 3.0 mS/cm 时,植物就会死亡。这表明,如果柳树植物从一开始就种植在这种浓度下,它们能够耐受更高强度的垃圾渗滤液。

相似文献

1
Phytotoxicity of landfill leachate on willow--Salix amygdalina L.垃圾渗滤液对柳树——垂柳的植物毒性
Waste Manag. 2010 Aug-Sep;30(8-9):1587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.033. Epub 2010 Mar 21.
2
Using fractal geometry to determine phytotoxicity of landfill leachate on willow.运用分形几何确定垃圾渗滤液对柳树的植物毒性。
Chemosphere. 2010 Apr;79(5):534-40. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.02.016. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
3
Treatment of landfill leachate by irrigation of willow coppice--plant response and treatment efficiency.柳灌丛浸滤处理垃圾渗滤液——植物响应与处理效率。
Environ Pollut. 2010 Mar;158(3):795-804. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
4
The controlling of landfill leachate evapotranspiration from soil-plant systems with willow: Salix amygdalina L.利用柳树(扁桃柳)对土壤-植物系统中垃圾渗滤液蒸发蒸腾作用的控制
Waste Manag Res. 2007 Feb;25(1):61-7. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07073106.
5
Landfill leachate treatment with willows and poplars--efficiency and plant response.柳树和杨树处理垃圾渗滤液的效率和植物反应。
Waste Manag. 2010 Nov;30(11):2137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.06.013. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
6
Effectiveness of leachate disposal by the young willow sprouts Salix amygdalina.柳叶柳幼芽对渗滤液的处理效果
Waste Manag Res. 2003 Dec;21(6):557-66. doi: 10.1177/0734242X0302100608.
7
Stress tolerance of five willow clones after irrigation with different amounts of landfill leachate.用不同量的垃圾渗滤液灌溉后五个柳树无性系的抗逆性
Bioresour Technol. 2006 Jan;97(1):150-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.004. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
8
Landfill cover soil, soil solution, and vegetation responses to municipal landfill leachate applications.垃圾填埋场覆盖土壤、土壤溶液及植被对城市垃圾渗滤液施加的响应。
J Environ Qual. 2008 Aug 8;37(5):1974-85. doi: 10.2134/jeq2007.0637. Print 2008 Sep-Oct.
9
Fate of saline ions in a planted landfill site with leachate recirculation.种植型垃圾填埋场中盐水离子的命运:渗滤液再循环。
Waste Manag. 2010 Jan;30(1):110-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.010. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
10
Phytoremediation of landfill leachate and compost wastewater by irrigation of Populus and Salix: Biomass and growth response.柳树和杨树灌溉处理垃圾渗滤液和堆肥废水的植物修复:生物量和生长响应。
Waste Manag. 2010 Jun;30(6):1032-42. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.013. Epub 2010 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Physiological Response of Different Brook Willow ( Boiss.) Ecotypes to Salinity.不同溪柳生态型对盐分的生理响应
Plants (Basel). 2022 Mar 10;11(6):739. doi: 10.3390/plants11060739.
2
Stomatal Conductance Measurement for Toxicity Assessment in Zero-Effluent Constructed Wetlands: Effects of Landfill Leachate on Hydrophytes.用于零排放人工湿地毒性评估的气孔导度测量:垃圾渗滤液对水生植物的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 5;16(3):468. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030468.