Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 27;365(1544):1273-9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0265.
A notable success for evolutionary genetics during the past century was to generate a coherent, quantitative explanation for an apparent evolutionary paradox: the tendency for multicellular organisms to show declining fitness with age (senescence, often referred to simply as 'ageing'). This general theory is now widely accepted and explains most of the features of senescence that are observed in natural and laboratory populations, but specific instantiations of that theory have been more controversial. To date, most of the empirical tests of these models have relied on data generated from biometric experiments. Modern population genetics and genomics provide new, and probably more powerful, ways to test ideas that are still controversial more than half a century after the original theory was developed. System-genetic experiments have the potential to address both evolutionary and mechanistic questions about ageing by identifying causal loci and the genetic networks with which they interact. Both the biometrical approaches and the newer approaches are reviewed here, with an emphasis on the challenges and limitations that each method faces.
在过去的一个世纪里,进化遗传学取得了一项显著的成功,它为一个明显的进化悖论提供了一个连贯的、定量的解释:多细胞生物随着年龄的增长而表现出适应性下降的趋势(衰老,通常简称为“老化”)。这个普遍理论现在被广泛接受,并解释了在自然和实验室种群中观察到的衰老的大多数特征,但该理论的具体实例更具争议性。迄今为止,这些模型的大多数实证检验都依赖于从生物计量实验中产生的数据。现代群体遗传学和基因组学为检验半个多世纪前提出的原始理论仍有争议的观点提供了新的、可能更强大的方法。系统遗传学实验有可能通过确定因果基因座以及与它们相互作用的遗传网络,来解决衰老的进化和机制问题。本文回顾了这两种方法,重点讨论了每种方法所面临的挑战和局限性。