• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低通量牙本质处理对 Er:YAG 激光制备牙本质与复合树脂粘结拉伸强度的影响:初步研究。

Effect of low fluency dentin conditioning on tensile bond strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin: a preliminary study.

机构信息

Department of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Mar;26(2):187-91. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0767-z. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10103-010-0767-z
PMID:20309596
Abstract

Several studies in the literature have previously shown that the bond strength of a composite bonded to dentin is almost equivalent as when dentin is prepared by either bur or Er:YAG laser. The aim of this preliminary study is to assess the hypothesis that dentin conditioning at low fluency by means of Er:YAG laser can improve the value of adhesion of composites resin to dentin. Sixty surfaces of caries-free human third molars extracted for orthodontic purposes were randomly divided into five groups of 12 teeth. The bur group was the control, prepared using bur, group L was prepared using Er:YAG 200 mJ, SSP (50 µs), 20 Hz, 15 seconds of sweeping, for groups L80, L100, L120, they were prepared first, with the same parameters of the group L 200, and then they received a conditioning, which is, respectively, 15 s of irradiations at: 80 mJ (SSP, 10 Hz), 100 mJ (SSP, 10 Hz), and 120 mJ (SSP, 10 Hz). All samples were restored in a single-component adhesive system: Xenon (DENTSPLY), and ceramX (DENTSPLY) as the resin composite. The specimens were submitted to tensile bond strength test using a universal testing machine. Data were submitted to statistical analysis using ANOVA coupled to a Tukey-Kramer test at the 95% level. The mean values in MPa were 33.3 for group B, 36.73 for group L 200, 41.7 for group L80, 37.9 for group L100, and 39.1 for group L120. Our results showed that dentin conditioning at a low fluency of 12.58 J/cm(2) per pulse, with 80 mJ output energy and 50-µs pulse duration can significantly improve tensile bond strength of a composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentine.

摘要

先前有几项文献研究表明,复合树脂与牙本质的粘结强度几乎与使用牙钻或 Er:YAG 激光制备牙本质时相同。本初步研究旨在评估以下假设:通过低能量密度的 Er:YAG 激光处理牙本质可以提高复合树脂对牙本质的粘结强度。

从正畸治疗中拔出的 60 颗无龋第三磨牙的牙本质表面被随机分为 5 组,每组 12 颗牙齿。牙钻组为对照组,用牙钻制备;激光组 L 用 Er:YAG 激光(200mJ、SSP、50µs、20Hz、15s 扫描)制备;激光组 L80、L100、L120 先用与激光组 L 相同的参数进行预处理,然后用以下参数进行处理:分别为 80mJ(SSP、10Hz)、100mJ(SSP、10Hz)和 120mJ(SSP、10Hz)各 15s 的激光照射。所有样本均用单组份粘结系统(Xenon,DENTSPLY 和 ceramX,DENTSPLY)进行修复。用万能试验机对试件进行拉伸粘结强度测试。数据采用方差分析(ANOVA)结合 Tukey-Kramer 检验,在 95%置信水平下进行统计分析。

各组的平均粘结强度值(MPa)分别为:B 组 33.3、L200 组 36.73、L80 组 41.7、L100 组 37.9、L120 组 39.1。结果表明,低能量密度(12.58J/cm2/脉冲)、80mJ 输出能量和 50µs 脉冲持续时间的激光处理可以显著提高 Er:YAG 激光制备牙本质的复合树脂的拉伸粘结强度。

相似文献

1
Effect of low fluency dentin conditioning on tensile bond strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin: a preliminary study.低通量牙本质处理对 Er:YAG 激光制备牙本质与复合树脂粘结拉伸强度的影响:初步研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Mar;26(2):187-91. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0767-z. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
2
Effect of acid etching duration on tensile bond strength of composite resin bonded to erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser-prepared dentine. Preliminary study.酸蚀时间对铒:钇-铝-石榴石激光制备牙本质与复合树脂粘结拉伸强度的影响。初步研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Nov;25(6):855-9. doi: 10.1007/s10103-009-0719-7. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
3
The effect of erbium family laser on tensile bond strength of composite to dentin in comparison with conventional method.铒激光与传统方法对牙本质黏结强度影响的比较
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Jan;28(1):139-42. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1086-3. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
4
Tensile bond strength of a flowable composite resin to ER:YAG-laser-treated dentin.可流动复合树脂与铒钇铝石榴石激光处理牙本质的拉伸粘结强度。
Lasers Surg Med. 2005 Jun;36(5):351-5. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20176.
5
The Effect of Energy Densities on the Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite to Er:YAG Pretreated Dentin.能量密度对自粘结可流动复合树脂与铒钇铝石榴石激光预处理牙本质粘结强度的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6507924. doi: 10.1155/2016/6507924. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
6
Shear bond strength of composite bonded to erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser-prepared dentin.复合树脂与铒:钇铝石榴石激光预处理牙本质的剪切粘结强度。
Lasers Med Sci. 2009 Jan;24(1):117-22. doi: 10.1007/s10103-007-0532-0. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
7
Shear bond strength and ultrastructural interface analysis of different adhesive systems to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin.不同粘结系统与铒钇铝石榴石激光制备牙本质的剪切粘结强度及超微结构界面分析
Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Feb;30(2):769-78. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1424-0. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
8
Bond strength of self-etching primer to bur cut, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Er:YAG lased dental surfaces.自酸蚀底漆与车针切割、铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光和铒:钇铝石榴石激光处理的牙面之间的粘结强度。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Oct;25(5):373-80. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2044.
9
Influence of different pulse durations of Er:YAG laser based on variable square pulse technology on microtensile bond strength of a self-etch adhesive to dentin.基于可变方波脉冲技术的不同脉冲持续时间的铒激光对自酸蚀粘结剂与牙本质微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Mar;31(3):116-24. doi: 10.1089/pho.2012.3286. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
10
Microtensile bond strength of an etch-and-rinse adhesive to enamel and dentin after Er:YAG laser pretreatment with different pulse durations.不同脉宽铒激光预处理后对牙釉质和牙本质的酸蚀-冲洗型粘结剂的微拉伸粘结强度。
Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jan;27(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0830-9. Epub 2010 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Micro-Morphological Features of the Er:YAG-Lased Interface in Primary Teeth: 12 Months Randomized Split-Mouth Trial.乳牙中铒激光治疗界面的微观形态特征:12个月随机分口试验
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Jan 1;15(1):17. doi: 10.3390/jfb15010017.
2
Influence of Low-Level Laser Modification and Adhesive Application Mode on the Bonding Efficiency of Universal Adhesives to Er:YAG Laser-Ablated Dentin.低强度激光改性及粘结剂应用方式对通用粘结剂与铒激光蚀刻牙本质粘结效率的影响
J Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Feb 16;12:e7. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.07. eCollection 2021.
3
Effect of Er:YAG laser etching on topography, microstructure, compressive strength, and bond strength of a universal adhesive to calcium silicate cements.

本文引用的文献

1
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of enamel and dentin surfaces after Er:YAG laser preparation and laser conditioning.铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光制备及激光预处理后牙釉质和牙本质表面的扫描电子显微镜评估
Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Oct;25(5):393-401. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.2069.
2
Influence of pulse repetition rate of Er:YAG laser and dentin depth on tensile bond strength of dentin-resin interface.
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 Aug;86(2):477-82. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31636.
3
Effect of energy and pulse repetition rate of Er: YAG laser on dentin ablation ability and morphological analysis of the laser-irradiated substrate.铒钇铝石榴石激光的能量和脉冲重复率对牙本质消融能力及激光照射后基底形态分析的影响
铒:钇铝石榴石激光蚀刻对通用粘结剂与硅酸钙水泥的润湿性、微观结构、抗压强度和粘结强度的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Feb;24(2):711-718. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02903-2. Epub 2019 May 24.
4
Effect of Er:YAG laser energy densities on thermally affected dentin layer: Morphological study.铒钇铝石榴石激光能量密度对热影响牙本质层的作用:形态学研究
Laser Ther. 2018 Jun 30;27(2):91-97. doi: 10.5978/islsm.18-OR-07.
5
Assessment of microleakage of class V restored by resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer and pit and fissure resin-based sealants following Er:YAG laser conditioning and acid etching: in vitro study.钬激光预处理和酸蚀后树脂复合材料、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀及窝沟树脂基封闭剂修复Ⅴ类洞微渗漏的评估:一项体外研究
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018 May 30;10:83-92. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S153989. eCollection 2018.
6
Effect of Airborne Particle Abrasion on Microtensile Bond Strength of Total-Etch Adhesives to Human Dentin.空气中颗粒磨损对全酸蚀黏结剂与牙本质间微拉伸黏结强度的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2432536. doi: 10.1155/2017/2432536. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
7
The Effect of Energy Densities on the Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite to Er:YAG Pretreated Dentin.能量密度对自粘结可流动复合树脂与铒钇铝石榴石激光预处理牙本质粘结强度的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6507924. doi: 10.1155/2016/6507924. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
8
Evaluation of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Effect on Microshear Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite in the Dentin of Permanent Molar: An In Vitro Study.铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光对恒牙磨牙牙本质中自粘性可流动复合树脂微剪切粘结强度的影响评估:一项体外研究。
Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:4856285. doi: 10.1155/2016/4856285. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
9
A Comparative Study of Microleakage on Dental Surfaces Bonded with Three Self-Etch Adhesive Systems Treated with the Er:YAG Laser and Bur.用铒钇铝石榴石激光和车针处理后,三种自酸蚀粘结系统粘结牙面的微渗漏比较研究
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2509757. doi: 10.1155/2016/2509757. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
10
Comparative Study of the Shear Bond Strength of Flowable Composite in Permanent Teeth Treated with Conventional Bur and Contact or Non-Contact Er:YAG Laser.传统车针与接触式或非接触式Er:YAG激光治疗恒牙时可流动复合树脂剪切粘结强度的比较研究
J Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Summer;5(3):140-5.
Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Feb;25(1):26-33. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.1075.
4
Resin bonding to dentin irradiated by high repetition rate Er:YAG laser.
Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Jun;24(3):397-401. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.397.
5
Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin and enamel.复合树脂与铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光预处理牙本质和牙釉质粘结的剪切粘结强度及扫描电子显微镜评估
Dent Mater. 2005 Jul;21(7):616-24. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.003.
6
Composite resin's adhesive resistance to dentin: influence of Er:YAG laser focal distance variation.复合树脂对牙本质的粘结抗力:铒钇铝石榴石激光焦距变化的影响
Photomed Laser Surg. 2005 Apr;23(2):229-32. doi: 10.1089/pho.2005.23.229.
7
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface after Er:YAG laser preparation.铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光制备后树脂-牙本质界面的扫描电子显微镜评估
Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35(1):51-7. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20063.
8
Comparative study of the dentin/adhesive systems interface after treatment with Er:YAG laser and acid etching using scanning electron microscope.
Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(5):385-90. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20064.
9
Effect of Er:YAG laser on bond strength to dentin of a self-etching primer and two single-bottle adhesive systems.
Lasers Surg Med. 2002;31(3):164-70. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10106.
10
Tensile bond strength of dentin-resinous system interfaces conditioned with Er:YAG laser irradiation.
J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2002 Apr;20(2):89-93. doi: 10.1089/104454702753768070.