Division of Pharmacognosy, Section of Metabolomics, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, PO Box 9502, 2300RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Phytochem Anal. 2010 Sep-Oct;21(5):451-6. doi: 10.1002/pca.1217.
Since the discovery of artemisinin in the 1970s, many techniques based on diverse chromatography techniques have been developed to detect and quantify this important antiplasmodial compound. The accurate quantification of this compound in the Artemisia annua plant material is mainly needed for breeding purposes in order to cultivate higher yielding varieties. It is also important for the quality control of herbal preparations containing A. annua plant material.
To evaluate the most common validated quantification techniques (LC-MS, HPLC-ELSD and TLC) and compare the results to quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (qNMR) in eight different A. annua samples collected from around the world.
The leaf material were extracted according to standard procedures and analysed with the validated quantification techniques. For the qNMR analysis we did not employ a standard curve but instead used an internal standard (maleid acid) which is not chemically related to artemisinin.
We found a significant difference between the results in this study. Compared with the qNMR results the HPLC-ELSD corresponded closely, followed by LC-MS. Quantitation with TLC led to an estimation range of -0.5 to +3.2 mg artemisinin/g of A. annua.
These results imply that qNMR, with the addition of an internal standard, can be used to quantify artemisinin in A. annua samples in a rapid and reproducible manner.
自 20 世纪 70 年代发现青蒿素以来,已经开发了许多基于不同色谱技术的技术来检测和定量这种重要的抗疟化合物。在青蒿植物材料中准确地定量这种化合物主要是为了繁殖目的,以培育出更高产量的品种。它对于含有青蒿植物材料的草药制剂的质量控制也很重要。
评估最常用的验证定量技术(LC-MS、HPLC-ELSD 和 TLC),并将结果与定量核磁共振波谱法(qNMR)在从世界各地收集的 8 个不同的青蒿样本中进行比较。
按照标准程序提取叶片材料,并使用验证的定量技术进行分析。对于 qNMR 分析,我们没有使用标准曲线,而是使用与青蒿素没有化学关系的内标(马来酸)。
我们发现研究结果之间存在显著差异。与 qNMR 结果相比,HPLC-ELSD 非常接近,其次是 LC-MS。TLC 的定量导致青蒿素估计范围为 -0.5 至 +3.2 mg/g 青蒿。
这些结果表明,qNMR 可以与内标一起用于快速、可重复地定量青蒿中的青蒿素。