Suppr超能文献

全静脉麻醉下传统经口气管插管与纤维光学经口气管插管的比较。

Comparison of orthodox with fibreoptic orotracheal intubation under total i.v. anaesthesia.

作者信息

Schaefer H G, Marsch S C

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Basel/Kantonsspital, Switzerland.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1991 May;66(5):608-10. doi: 10.1093/bja/66.5.608.

Abstract

Fibreoptic orotracheal intubation was compared with orthodox laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation using a total i.v. technique with propofol in 60 ASA I and II patients. There was no significant difference between the two techniques in haemodynamic profile (before, during and following the intubation procedure) and incidence of postoperative sore throat. Minimal oxygen saturation was 96% during the study; maximal end-tidal PCO2 after intubation was 5.4 kPa. Intubation time was faster (P less than 0.01) in the orthodox group (30.7 (SEM 2.3) s) than in the fibreoptic group (52.7 (4.8) s).

摘要

在60例ASA I级和II级患者中,采用全静脉丙泊酚技术,对纤维光导经口气管插管与传统喉镜下气管插管进行了比较。两种技术在血流动力学指标(插管前、插管期间和插管后)及术后咽痛发生率方面无显著差异。研究期间最低氧饱和度为96%;插管后最大呼气末二氧化碳分压为5.4 kPa。传统组的插管时间(30.7(标准误2.3)秒)比纤维光导组(52.7(4.8)秒)更快(P<0.01)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验