Schaefer H G, Marsch S C
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Basel/Kantonsspital, Switzerland.
Br J Anaesth. 1991 May;66(5):608-10. doi: 10.1093/bja/66.5.608.
Fibreoptic orotracheal intubation was compared with orthodox laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation using a total i.v. technique with propofol in 60 ASA I and II patients. There was no significant difference between the two techniques in haemodynamic profile (before, during and following the intubation procedure) and incidence of postoperative sore throat. Minimal oxygen saturation was 96% during the study; maximal end-tidal PCO2 after intubation was 5.4 kPa. Intubation time was faster (P less than 0.01) in the orthodox group (30.7 (SEM 2.3) s) than in the fibreoptic group (52.7 (4.8) s).
在60例ASA I级和II级患者中,采用全静脉丙泊酚技术,对纤维光导经口气管插管与传统喉镜下气管插管进行了比较。两种技术在血流动力学指标(插管前、插管期间和插管后)及术后咽痛发生率方面无显著差异。研究期间最低氧饱和度为96%;插管后最大呼气末二氧化碳分压为5.4 kPa。传统组的插管时间(30.7(标准误2.3)秒)比纤维光导组(52.7(4.8)秒)更快(P<0.01)。