Schaefer H G, Marsch S C, Strebel S P, Drewe J
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Basel, Kantonsspital, Switzerland.
Anaesthesia. 1992 Dec;47(12):1034-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb04196.x.
The cardiovascular response to fiberoptic oral intubation under total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol or a balanced volatile technique with thiopentone/enflurane was compared in 50 patients of physical status ASA 1 and 2 who were scheduled for elective ear, nose and throat surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive propofol or enflurane. There was no significant difference between the two anaesthetic techniques in haemodynamic profile either before, during or after fibreoptic intubation (the study design was adequate to detect a 20% difference with > 90% statistical power), in incidence of postoperative sore throat or in time taken for intubation. In no patient did the oxygen saturation decrease to below 95% or the CO2 tension exceed 5.8 kPa.
在50例拟行择期耳鼻喉手术、身体状况为ASA 1级和2级的患者中,比较了丙泊酚全静脉麻醉或硫喷妥钠/恩氟烷平衡挥发性技术下纤维光学经口插管时的心血管反应。患者被随机分配接受丙泊酚或恩氟烷。在纤维光学插管前、插管期间或插管后,两种麻醉技术在血流动力学指标方面(该研究设计足以检测出20%的差异且具有>90%的统计效能)、术后咽痛发生率或插管所需时间方面均无显著差异。没有患者的氧饱和度降至95%以下或二氧化碳分压超过5.8 kPa。