Castello R, Pearson A C, Lenzen P, Labovitz A J
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Louis University School of Medicine, Missouri.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Jun;17(7):1499-506. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90638-p.
The effect of mitral regurgitation on pulmonary venous flow velocity was studied in 66 patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography. Nine patients were studied intraoperatively before and after surgery, so that 75 pulmonary venous flow tracings were analyzed. Fifty-four patients had no significant (0 to 1+) mitral regurgitation and 21 had significant (2 to 3+) mitral regurgitation. Comparison of both groups revealed significant differences in the pulmonary venous flow pattern. In patients with no significant mitral regurgitation, the peak systolic velocity was higher (55 +/- 16 vs. -4 +/- 16 cm/s; p less than 0.0001) and the peak diastolic velocity was lower (43 +/- 13 vs. 59 +/- 17 cm/s; p less than 0.01) when compared with values in patients with significant mitral regurgitation. Consequently, the peak systolic/diastolic velocity ratio was significantly higher in the patients without significant mitral regurgitation (1.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.4 +/- 1.3; p less than 0.0001). The same trend was noted with respect to the systolic and diastolic velocity integrals. As the degree of mitral regurgitation increased, the peak diastolic velocity and diastolic velocity integral increased, whereas the peak systolic velocity and systolic velocity integral decreased. In patients with severe mitral regurgitation, the systolic flow became reversed (retrograde). The sensitivity of reversed systolic flow for severe mitral regurgitation was 90% (9 of 10), the specificity was 100% (65 of 65), the positive predictive value was 100% (9 of 9), the negative predictive value was 98% (65 of 66) and the predictive accuracy was 99% (74 of 75).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对66例接受经食管超声心动图检查的患者研究了二尖瓣反流对肺静脉血流速度的影响。9例患者在手术前后进行了术中研究,共分析了75条肺静脉血流曲线。54例患者无明显(0至1+)二尖瓣反流,21例有明显(2至3+)二尖瓣反流。两组比较显示肺静脉血流模式存在显著差异。与有明显二尖瓣反流的患者相比,无明显二尖瓣反流的患者收缩期峰值速度更高(55±16 vs. -4±16 cm/s;p<0.0001),舒张期峰值速度更低(43±13 vs. 59±17 cm/s;p<0.01)。因此,无明显二尖瓣反流的患者收缩期/舒张期峰值速度比显著更高(1.4±0.5 vs. 0.4±1.3;p<0.0001)。收缩期和舒张期速度积分也呈现相同趋势。随着二尖瓣反流程度增加,舒张期峰值速度和舒张期速度积分增加,而收缩期峰值速度和收缩期速度积分降低。在严重二尖瓣反流患者中,收缩期血流出现逆转(逆行)。收缩期血流逆转对严重二尖瓣反流的敏感性为90%(10例中的9例),特异性为100%(65例中的65例),阳性预测值为100%(9例中的9例),阴性预测值为98%(66例中的65例),预测准确性为99%(75例中的74例)。(摘要截短至250字)