Suppr超能文献

回顾性数据访问:ENGAGE 同意经验。

Retrospective access to data: the ENGAGE consent experience.

机构信息

Université de Montréal, Faculté de droit, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Jul;18(7):741-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.30. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

Abstract

The rapid emergence of large-scale genetic databases raises issues at the nexus of medical law and ethics, as well as the need, at both national and international levels, for an appropriate and effective framework for their governance. This is even more so for retrospective access to data for secondary uses, wherein the original consent did not foresee such use. The first part of this paper provides a brief historical overview of the ethical and legal frameworks governing consent issues in biobanking generally, before turning to the secondary use of retrospective data in epidemiological biobanks. Such use raises particularly complex issues when (1) the original consent provided is restricted; (2) the minor research subject reaches legal age; (3) the research subject dies; or (4) samples and data were obtained during medical care. Our analysis demonstrates the inconclusive, and even contradictory, nature of guidelines and confirms the current lack of compatible regulations. The second part of this paper uses the European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology (ENGAGE Consortium) as a case study to illustrate the challenges of research using previously collected data sets in Europe. Our study of 52 ENGAGE consent forms and information documents shows that a broad range of mechanisms were developed to enable secondary use of the data that are part of the ENGAGE Consortium.

摘要

大型基因数据库的迅速出现引发了医学法律和伦理问题,以及在国家和国际层面上需要一个适当和有效的治理框架。对于回溯性访问数据进行二次利用来说更是如此,因为原始同意并没有预见到这种使用。本文第一部分简要回顾了一般生物库中同意问题的伦理和法律框架,然后转向回溯性数据在流行病学生物库中的二次利用。当(1)原始同意受到限制;(2)未成年研究对象达到法定年龄;(3)研究对象死亡;或(4)样本和数据是在医疗过程中获得时,这种使用会引发特别复杂的问题。我们的分析表明,指导方针的不确定性,甚至是相互矛盾的,证实了当前缺乏兼容的法规。本文第二部分使用欧洲遗传和基因组流行病学网络(ENGAGE 联盟)作为案例研究,说明了在欧洲使用先前收集的数据集进行研究所面临的挑战。我们对 52 份 ENGAGE 同意书和信息文件的研究表明,为了能够对 ENGAGE 联盟数据进行二次利用,开发了广泛的机制。

相似文献

1
Retrospective access to data: the ENGAGE consent experience.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Jul;18(7):741-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.30. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
4
International Guidelines for Privacy in Genomic Biobanking (or the Unexpected Virtue of Pluralism).
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Winter;43(4):690-702. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12312.
7
The ethics of research biobanking: a critical review of the literature.
Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2008;25:429-52. doi: 10.5661/bger-25-429.
8
Consent, ethics and genetic biobanks: the case of the Athlome project.
BMC Genomics. 2017 Nov 14;18(Suppl 8):830. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4189-1.
10
The informed consent aftermath of the genetic revolution. An Italian example of implementation.
Med Health Care Philos. 2008 Jun;11(2):181-90. doi: 10.1007/s11019-007-9086-y. Epub 2007 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Biobank Digitalization: From Data Acquisition to Efficient Use.
Biology (Basel). 2024 Nov 22;13(12):957. doi: 10.3390/biology13120957.
2
Pass the tissue: restoring researcher access to legal human donations.
J Med Ethics. 2025 Feb 21;51(3):174-177. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109033.
5
What does engagement mean to participants in longitudinal cohort studies? A qualitative study.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 24;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00648-w.
6
Health data research on sudden cardiac arrest: perspectives of survivors and their next-of-kin.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jan 28;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00576-9.
7
How Can We Not Waste Legacy Genomic Research Data?
Front Genet. 2020 May 8;11:446. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00446. eCollection 2020.
8
Recontacting participants for expanded uses of existing samples and data: a case study.
Genet Med. 2017 Aug;19(8):883-889. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.207. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
9
Gene mutations responsible for primary immunodeficiency disorders: A report from the first primary immunodeficiency biobank in Iran.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2016 Dec 2;12:62. doi: 10.1186/s13223-016-0166-5. eCollection 2016.
10
Participant views on consent in cancer genetics research: preparing for the precision medicine era.
J Community Genet. 2016 Apr;7(2):133-43. doi: 10.1007/s12687-015-0259-8. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Research ethics. Children and population biobanks.
Science. 2009 Aug 14;325(5942):818-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1173284.
3
Genomics and policymaking: from static models to complex systems?
Hum Genet. 2009 May;125(4):375-9. doi: 10.1007/s00439-009-0644-7. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
4
Broadening consent--and diluting ethics?
J Med Ethics. 2009 Feb;35(2):125-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024851.
5
Research on ethics in two large Human Biomonitoring projects ECNIS and NewGeneris: a bottom up approach.
Environ Health. 2008 Jun 5;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-S1-S7.
6
Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research.
J Pediatr. 2006 Jul;149(1 Suppl):S34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.049.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验