Suppr超能文献

用于评估转移性腺癌积液的双色免疫细胞化学法。

Two-color immunocytochemistry for evaluation of effusion fluids for metastatic adenocarcinoma.

作者信息

Shidham Vinod B, Varsegi George, D'Amore Krista

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Cytojournal. 2010 Feb 10;7:1. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.59887.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of serous fluids by conventional one color immunocytochemistry is complex and challenging.

DESIGN

We selected and studied 37 serous fluid cytology specimens (23 pleural, 13 peritoneal, 1 pericardial), collected over a 4-year period. They were unequivocally positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma based on clinical correlation, cytomorphology, and one color immunocytochemistry on cell block sections. 3 mum serial sections of cell blocks were immunostained by a two chromogen method (peroxidase with brown chromogen followed by alkaline phosphatase with red chromogen). Combinations evaluated were: A- vimentin followed by cytokeratin (CK) 7; B- calretinin followed by BerEP4, C- calretinin followed by CK 20. Additionally, difficulty of interpretation was evaluated on a scale of 1(easy) to 5 (difficult). Cases demonstrating decreased or complete loss of immunoreactivity with alkaline phosphatase red chromogen system were also evaluated with routine one color immunostaining by alkaline phosphatase and peroxidase individually. The pretreatments for antigen retrieval and antibody dilutions were identical to those used for conventional one color immunostaining with respective immunomarker.

RESULT

Combination 'A' showed correlation with the immunoreactivity pattern observed with one color immunostaining. However, the immunoreactivity of the second immunomarker was compromised in combinations B and C. In the latter group, the sections immunostained with one color alkaline phosphatase indicator system also showed weak immunoreactivity or complete loss of immunoreactivity for the corresponding second immunomarker. However, the peroxidase system showed proper immunoreactivity for those immunomarkers. Average difficulty of interpretation for the two color method was 1.06 (range- 1 to 2) as compared to 2.95 (range: 1 to 5) with the one color method. This difference was statistically significant (two-tailed P<.0001, paired t test). The higher scores of difficulty were observed in cases with a paucity of tumor cells and cases with predominance of isolated tumor cells.

CONCLUSION

Dual immunostaining facilitated identification of the foreign population of malignant cells in effusion fluids with objective, reproducible precision. However, due to relatively lower sensitivity of alkaline phosphatase as a second indicator system, immunoreactivity was diminished for BerEP4 and lost for CK 20.

摘要

背景

通过传统的单色免疫细胞化学方法评估浆液性体液复杂且具有挑战性。

设计

我们选取并研究了在4年期间收集的37例浆液性体液细胞学标本(23例胸腔积液、13例腹腔积液、1例心包积液)。基于临床相关性、细胞形态学以及细胞块切片上的单色免疫细胞化学,这些标本均明确为转移性腺癌阳性。细胞块的3μm连续切片采用双显色法进行免疫染色(先用棕色显色剂的过氧化物酶,再用红色显色剂的碱性磷酸酶)。评估的组合有:A -波形蛋白后接细胞角蛋白(CK)7;B -钙视网膜蛋白后接BerEP4;C -钙视网膜蛋白后接CK 20。此外,按照1(容易)至5(困难)的等级对解读难度进行评估。对于碱性磷酸酶红色显色剂系统免疫反应性降低或完全丧失的病例,也分别用碱性磷酸酶和过氧化物酶进行常规单色免疫染色评估。抗原修复和抗体稀释的预处理与使用相应免疫标志物的传统单色免疫染色相同。

结果

组合“A”显示出与单色免疫染色观察到的免疫反应模式相关。然而,组合B和C中第二种免疫标志物的免疫反应性受到影响。在后者组中,用单色碱性磷酸酶指示系统免疫染色的切片对相应的第二种免疫标志物也显示出弱免疫反应性或免疫反应性完全丧失。然而,过氧化物酶系统对那些免疫标志物显示出适当的免疫反应性。双色法的平均解读难度为1.06(范围为1至2),而单色法为2.95(范围为1至5)。这种差异具有统计学意义(双尾P <.0001,配对t检验)。在肿瘤细胞稀少和孤立肿瘤细胞占优势的病例中观察到较高的难度评分。

结论

双重免疫染色有助于以客观、可重复的精度识别积液中恶性细胞的异质性群体。然而,由于碱性磷酸酶作为第二种指示系统的敏感性相对较低,BerEP4的免疫反应性减弱,CK 20的免疫反应性丧失。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/2841748/0fa092b18db5/CJ-07-1-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验