Shidham Vinod B, Janikowski Beata
Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Karmanos Cancer Center, and Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Technical Specialist-IHC, DMC University Laboratories, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Cytojournal. 2022 Jan 31;19:6. doi: 10.25259/CMAS_02_15_2021. eCollection 2022.
Definitive cytopathological interpretation of some of the effusion fluids may not be possible based on cytomorphological evaluation alone. As discussed in other reviews, this is due to various reasons specifically applicable to effusion fluids including remarkably wide morphologic spectrum of reactive mesothelial cells overlapping with some well to moderately differentiated metastatic carcinoma. The challenge is subject to various factors including level of interpreter training or experience, institutional demographics (such as type of prevalent diseases, predominant sex and age group), technical advances in ancillary support, and expertise in cytopreparatory processing. In such cases immunohistochemistry performed on cell-block sections is simple objective adjunct with or without other ancillary techniques. Ongoing increase in number of immunomarkers along with rabbit monoclonal antibodies with relatively higher affinity is further refining this field. SCIP (subtractive coordinate immunoreactivity pattern) approach, discussed as separate dedicated review article, facilitates refined interpretation of immunoreactivity pattern in coordinate manner on various serial sections of cell-blocks. However, many variables such as delay after specimen collection, specimen processing related factors including fixation and storage; ambient conditions under which paraffin blocks are archived (for retrospective testing); antigen retrieval method; duration of antigen retrieval step; antibody clone and dilution; and antibody application time are common with application of immunohistochemistry in other areas. This review is dedicated to highlight technical aspects including processing of effusion specimens for optimum immunocytochemical evaluation along with commonly used immunomarkers in effusion cytopathology. This review focuses on the technical and general information about various immunomarkers.
仅基于细胞形态学评估,可能无法对某些积液进行明确的细胞病理学解释。正如其他综述中所讨论的,这是由于多种特定于积液的原因,包括反应性间皮细胞形态谱非常广泛,与一些高分化至中分化的转移性癌重叠。这一挑战受多种因素影响,包括解释人员的培训水平或经验、机构人口统计学特征(如流行疾病类型、主要性别和年龄组)、辅助支持的技术进步以及细胞制备处理方面的专业知识。在这种情况下,对细胞块切片进行免疫组织化学检查是一种简单客观的辅助手段,无论是否使用其他辅助技术。随着免疫标志物数量的不断增加以及具有相对较高亲和力的兔单克隆抗体的出现,这一领域正在进一步完善。SCIP(减法坐标免疫反应模式)方法,在另一篇单独的专题综述文章中进行了讨论,它有助于以坐标方式对细胞块的各个连续切片上的免疫反应模式进行精确解释。然而,许多变量,如标本采集后的延迟、标本处理相关因素(包括固定和储存)、石蜡块存档的环境条件(用于回顾性检测)、抗原修复方法、抗原修复步骤的持续时间、抗体克隆和稀释度以及抗体应用时间,在免疫组织化学应用于其他领域时也很常见。本综述致力于突出技术方面,包括积液标本的处理以进行最佳免疫细胞化学评估,以及积液细胞病理学中常用的免疫标志物。本综述重点关注各种免疫标志物的技术和一般信息。