Thoraxzentrum Ruhrgebiet, Kliniken für Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Herne und Bochum, Germany.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Apr;10(4):279-87. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70032-3.
The increasing numbers of patients who are elderly and severely disabled has led to the introduction of a new category of pneumonia management: health-care-associated pneumonia (HCAP). An analysis of the available evidence in support of this category, however, reveals heterogeneous and misleading definitions of HCAP, reliance on microbiological data of questionable validity, failure to recognise the contribution of aspiration pneumonia, failure to control microbial patterns for functional status, and failure to recognise frequently applied restrictions of treatment escalation as bias in assessing outcomes. As a result, the concept of HCAP contributes to confusion more than it provides a guide to pneumonia management, and it potentially leads to overtreatment. We suggest a reassignment of the criteria for HCAP to reconstruct the triad of community-acquired pneumonia (with a recognised core group of elderly and disabled patients and a subgroup of younger patients), hospital-acquired pneumonia, and pneumonia in immunosuppressed patients.
医疗保健相关性肺炎(HCAP)。然而,对支持这一类别证据的分析显示,HCAP 的定义存在异质性和误导性,依赖于微生物数据的有效性值得怀疑,未能认识到吸入性肺炎的贡献,未能控制功能状态的微生物模式,以及未能认识到经常应用的治疗升级限制是评估结果的偏见。因此,HCAP 的概念与其说是肺炎管理的指南,不如说是导致混乱的因素,并且可能导致过度治疗。我们建议重新分配 HCAP 的标准,以重建社区获得性肺炎(具有公认的老年和残疾患者核心群体以及年轻患者亚组)、医院获得性肺炎和免疫抑制患者肺炎的三联征。