Department of Environmental Health Sciences, and UCLA Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Jr Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.
J Hazard Mater. 2010 Jul 15;179(1-3):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.02.057. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
The aim was to measure the permeation of the fungicide chlorothalonil from Bravo Ultrex through disposable (Safeskin) and chemically protective (Solvex) nitrile glove materials in a closed-loop ASTM type permeation cell system employing different collection side solvents. The permeated fungicide was measured in the collection medium by the internal standard method through capillary gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and selective ion monitoring using m/z 222 (internal standard 4,4'-dichlorobiphenyl), and 224 and 226 (chlorothalonil). The permeated glove materials did not show swelling or shrinkage and infrared reflectance changes. Different permeated masses for the same glove material for aqueous emulsion challenges of 2.2 mg/mL Bravo Ultrex for 8 h were observed for different solvents with isopropanol>hexane>water for Safeskin, and isopropanol=hexane>water for Solvex. Solvex gloves always permeated less than Safeskin gloves for the same challenge time. When challenges with solid Bravo Ultrex occurred, chlorothalonil was still found in the collection side in the same solvent order as for the aqueous emulsion challenges, with Solvex always less than Safeskin for the same collection solvent and same challenge time. Kinetic experiments showed isopropanol was not a suitable collection solvent for Safeskin for 4 and 8 h. Hexane was not a valid collection solvent for Solvex and Safeskin for 8 h, but was better than isopropanol.
目的是测量杀菌剂百菌清从 Bravo Ultrex 通过一次性(Safeskin)和化学防护(Solvex)丁腈手套材料在闭路 ASTM 型渗透细胞系统中的渗透,该系统采用不同的收集侧溶剂。通过毛细气相色谱-质谱法和使用 m/z 222(内标 4,4'-二氯联苯)、224 和 226(百菌清)的选择离子监测,通过内标法在收集介质中测量渗透的杀菌剂。渗透的手套材料没有显示出膨胀或收缩以及红外反射变化。对于相同的手套材料,对于水性乳液挑战,对于 Safeskin 来说,不同溶剂的渗透质量不同,异丙醇>正己烷>水,而对于 Solvex,则是异丙醇=正己烷>水。对于相同的挑战时间,Solvex 手套的渗透量总是小于 Safeskin 手套。当发生固体 Bravo Ultrex 挑战时,在与水性乳液挑战相同的溶剂顺序中,仍然在收集侧发现百菌清,对于相同的收集溶剂和相同的挑战时间,Solvex 总是少于 Safeskin。动力学实验表明,异丙醇不是 Safeskin 4 和 8 h 的合适收集溶剂。正己烷不是 Solvex 和 Safeskin 8 h 的有效收集溶剂,但优于异丙醇。