文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

可能存在不同文化背景下对嗓音障碍影响感知的差异。

Possible cross-cultural differences in the perception of impact of voice disorders.

机构信息

Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Voice Research Laboratory, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Voice. 2011 May;25(3):348-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.10.005. Epub 2010 Mar 23.


DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.10.005
PMID:20335004
Abstract

UNLABELLED: Perception of the impact of voice disorders may differ across different cultural backgrounds. This study investigated the difference in the perception of the impact of voice disorders between the American (Pittsburgh) and Chinese (Hong Kong) cultures. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Sixty dysphonic subjects from Hong Kong, China, and 60 dysphonic subjects from Pittsburgh, USA, were recruited to complete the Chinese and English versions of the Voice Activity and Participation Profile (VAPP), respectively. Data analyses using independent t tests were conducted on (1) the total profile scores; (b) total activity limitation score (ALS) and total participation restriction score (PRS); (c) section scores of job, daily communication, and social communication; and (d) section ALS and section PRS. RESULTS: Hong Kong subjects showed significantly higher scores than the Pittsburgh subjects in total profile and other subsections except in the job PRS. CONCLUSION: RESULTS support the possible influence of individualist and collectivist cultures on the perceived impact of voice disorders on the activity and participation.

摘要

未加标签:对语音障碍影响的感知可能因文化背景而异。本研究调查了美国(匹兹堡)和中国(香港)文化之间对语音障碍影响感知的差异。

研究设计与设置:分别从中国香港和美国匹兹堡招募了 60 名发音障碍患者完成中文版和英文版的语音活动与参与概况调查问卷(VAPP)。使用独立 t 检验对以下方面进行数据分析:(1)总体概况评分;(b)总活动受限评分(ALS)和总参与限制评分(PRS);(c)工作、日常交流和社会交流的部分评分;(d)部分 ALS 和部分 PRS。

结果:香港患者的总体概况和其他部分评分均显著高于匹兹堡患者,除了工作 PRS 评分。

结论:研究结果支持个体主义和集体主义文化对语音障碍对活动和参与的感知影响的可能影响。

相似文献

[1]
Possible cross-cultural differences in the perception of impact of voice disorders.

J Voice. 2010-3-23

[2]
Psychometric Properties of Voice Activity Participation Profile-Persian Version (VAPPP).

J Voice. 2018-9

[3]
Coping strategies in teachers with vocal complaint.

J Voice. 2014-5

[4]
Application of the Mandarin Chinese version of the Voice Handicap Index.

J Voice. 2010-1-18

[5]
Voice Self-assessment Protocols: Different Trends Among Organic and Behavioral Dysphonias.

J Voice. 2017-1

[6]
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hong Kong-Chinese Version of Children's Voice Handicap Index.

J Voice. 2022-5

[7]
Development and Validation of an Iranian Voice Quality of Life Profile (IVQLP) Based on a Classic and Rasch Rating Scale Model (RSM).

J Voice. 2017-1

[8]
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of the Voice Symptom Scale (I-VoiSS).

J Voice. 2017-11

[9]
Mandarin (Simplified) Chinese Version of the Voice Activity and Participation Profile: Adaptation and Validation.

J Voice. 2019-1

[10]
The Influence of Occupation on Self-perceived Vocal Problems in Patients With Voice Complaints.

J Voice. 2018-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Validation of the Spanish Version of the Voice-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Clinical Applications.

Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2025

[2]
Disability weight measurement for the severity of different diseases in Wuhan, China.

Popul Health Metr. 2023-5-4

[3]
Eliciting national and subnational sets of disability weights in mainland China: Findings from the Chinese disability weight measurement study.

Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022-7-26

[4]
Assessing disability weights based on the responses of 30,660 people from four European countries.

Popul Health Metr. 2015-4-3

[5]
Review of disability weight studies: comparison of methodological choices and values.

Popul Health Metr. 2014-8-23

[6]
Improved and standardized method for assessing years lived with disability after injury.

Bull World Health Organ. 2012-3-13

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索