Neurobehavioural Associates, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
J Pers Assess. 2011 Sep-Oct;93(5):508-17. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.594132.
This study examined the association between Symptom Validity Test (SVT) failure and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008), in the Forensic Disability Claimant samples described in the MMPI-2-RF Technical Manual (Tellegen & Ben-Porath, 2008 a, 2008b). SVTs used included the Word Memory Test (Green, 2003), the Computerized Assessment of Response Bias (Allen, Conder, Green, & Cox, 1997), the Medical Symptom Validity Test (Green, 2004), and the Test of Memory Malingering (Tombaugh, 1996). SVT failure was associated with significant elevations throughout the MMPI-2-RF overreporting validity scales and substantive scales. Pairwise contrasts between groups failing 0 and 3 SVTs revealed predominantly large effect sizes for the overreporting validity scales (d = 0.78-1.11), and many of the substantive scales, including the Cognitive Complaints (COG) scale. Results of this study demonstrate an association between SVT performance and elevated scores on the MMPI-2-RF. These results suggest that exaggeration of cognitive symptoms as demonstrated by SVT failure is also associated with overreported emotional, somatic, and neurocognitive complaints on the MMPI-2-RF.
本研究考察了症状效度测试(SVT)失败与明尼苏达多相人格测验-第二版结构形式(MMPI-2-RF;Ben-Porath & Tellegen,2008)之间的关联,该研究对象为 MMPI-2-RF 技术手册(Tellegen & Ben-Porath,2008a,2008b)中所描述的法医残疾索赔样本。所使用的 SVTs 包括单词记忆测试(Green,2003)、计算机反应偏差评估(Allen、Conder、Green 和 Cox,1997)、医学症状效度测试(Green,2004)和记忆伪装测试(Tombaugh,1996)。SVT 失败与 MMPI-2-RF 中显著升高的过度报告有效性量表和实质性量表有关。对 SVT 失败 0 次和 3 次的两组进行两两比较,发现过度报告有效性量表的主要效应量较大(d=0.78-1.11),而许多实质性量表,包括认知抱怨(COG)量表,也存在较大效应量。这项研究的结果表明 SVT 表现与 MMPI-2-RF 上的高分之间存在关联。这些结果表明,SVT 失败所表现出的认知症状夸大与 MMPI-2-RF 上过度报告的情绪、躯体和神经认知抱怨也有关联。