• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄/种族差异与乳腺癌三阴性亚型的 HER2 检测和发病率:一项基于人群的研究及首次报告。

Age/race differences in HER2 testing and in incidence rates for breast cancer triple subtypes: a population-based study and first report.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 Jun 1;116(11):2549-59. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25016.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.25016
PMID:20336785
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although US year 2000 guidelines recommended characterizing breast cancers by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), national cancer registries do not collect HER2, rendering a population-based understanding of HER2 and clinical "triple subtypes" (estrogen receptor [ER] / progesterone receptor [PR] / HER2) largely unknown. We document the population-based prevalence of HER2 testing / status, triple subtypes and present the first report of subtype incidence rates.

METHODS

Medical records were searched for HER2 on 1842 metropolitan Atlanta females diagnosed with breast cancer during 2003-2004. HER2 testing/status and triple subtypes were analyzed by age, race/ethnicity, tumor factors, socioeconomic status, and treatment. Age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Over 90% of cases received HER2 testing: 12.6% were positive, 71.7% negative, and 15.7% unknown. HER2 testing compliance was significantly better for women who were younger, of Caucasian or African-American descent, or diagnosed with early stage disease. Incidence rates (per 100,000) were 21.1 for HER2+ tumors and 27.8 for triple-negative tumors, the latter differing by race (36.3 and 19.4 for black and white women, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 recommendations are not uniformly adhered to. Incidence rates for breast cancer triple subtypes differ by age/race. As biologic knowledge is translated into the clinical setting eg, HER2 as a biomarker, it will be incumbent upon national cancer registries to report this information. Incidence rates cautiously extrapolate to an annual burden of 3000 and 17,000 HER2+ tumors for black and white women, respectively, and triple-negative tumors among 5000 and 16,000 respectively. Testing, rate, and burden variations warrant population-based in-depth exploration and clinical translation.

摘要

背景

尽管美国 2000 年的指南建议根据人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)对乳腺癌进行分类,但国家癌症登记处并未收集 HER2 数据,这使得人们对 HER2 和临床“三阴性”(雌激素受体 [ER] /孕激素受体 [PR] / HER2)的了解主要局限于人口层面。我们记录了基于人群的 HER2 检测/状态、三阴性以及首次报告的亚型发病率。

方法

我们对 2003 年至 2004 年间在亚特兰大市区诊断为乳腺癌的 1842 名女性的医疗记录进行了 HER2 检测搜索。根据年龄、种族/民族、肿瘤因素、社会经济地位和治疗方法分析 HER2 检测/状态和三阴性。计算了年龄调整后的发病率。

结果

超过 90%的病例接受了 HER2 检测:12.6%为阳性,71.7%为阴性,15.7%为未知。年龄较小、白种人或非裔美国人、或诊断为早期疾病的女性 HER2 检测依从性明显更好。HER2+肿瘤的发病率(每 10 万人)为 21.1,三阴性肿瘤的发病率为 27.8,后者因种族而异(黑人和白人分别为 36.3 和 19.4)。

结论

HER2 推荐并非普遍遵循。乳腺癌三阴性的发病率因年龄/种族而异。随着生物学知识转化为临床实践,例如 HER2 作为生物标志物,国家癌症登记处将有责任报告这些信息。发病率谨慎外推到每年分别有 3000 例和 17000 例 HER2+肿瘤以及每年分别有 5000 例和 16000 例三阴性肿瘤的黑人女性和白人女性。检测、发病率和负担的变化需要进行基于人群的深入探索和临床转化。

相似文献

1
Age/race differences in HER2 testing and in incidence rates for breast cancer triple subtypes: a population-based study and first report.年龄/种族差异与乳腺癌三阴性亚型的 HER2 检测和发病率:一项基于人群的研究及首次报告。
Cancer. 2010 Jun 1;116(11):2549-59. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25016.
2
Age-specific incidence of breast cancer subtypes: understanding the black-white crossover.乳腺癌亚型的年龄特异性发病率:理解黑-白交叉现象。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jul 18;104(14):1094-101. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs264. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
3
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, Featuring Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, and State.《1975 - 2011年美国癌症现状年度报告:按种族/族裔、贫困状况及州划分的乳腺癌亚型发病率》
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 30;107(6):djv048. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv048. Print 2015 Jun.
4
US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status.美国联合激素受体和 HER2 状态定义的乳腺癌亚型发病率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr 28;106(5):dju055. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju055.
5
Lifetime risks of specific breast cancer subtypes among women in four racial/ethnic groups.四种族裔群体中女性特定乳腺癌亚型的终生风险。
Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):R99. doi: 10.1186/bcr2780. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
6
Race and triple negative threats to breast cancer survival: a population-based study in Atlanta, GA.种族与三阴性乳腺癌对生存的威胁:佐治亚州亚特兰大市的一项基于人群的研究
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jan;113(2):357-70. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9926-3. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
7
Racial comparison of receptor-defined breast cancer in Southern African women: subtype prevalence and age-incidence analysis of nationwide cancer registry data.南非女性受体定义的乳腺癌种族比较:基于全国癌症登记数据的亚型患病率和年龄发病率分析
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Nov;23(11):2311-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0603. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
8
The epidemiology of triple-negative breast cancer, including race.三阴性乳腺癌的流行病学,包括种族因素。
Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Sep;20(7):1071-82. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9331-1. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
9
Prognostic features of breast cancer differ between women in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Belgium.刚果民主共和国和比利时女性乳腺癌的预后特征存在差异。
Breast. 2015 Oct;24(5):642-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.07.031. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
10
Racial Differences in the Use and Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Results From the National Cancer Data Base.种族差异对乳腺癌新辅助化疗的应用和结局的影响:来自国家癌症数据库的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 20;33(36):4267-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7801. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in the distribution of HER2-positive breast tumors according to ethnicity and genetic variants in : a special focus on Asian and Latina women.根据种族和基因变异的HER2阳性乳腺肿瘤分布差异:特别关注亚洲和拉丁裔女性。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;15:1635681. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1635681. eCollection 2025.
2
HER2-low prevalence among Hispanic/Latino women with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.西班牙裔/拉丁裔乳腺癌女性中HER2低表达的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 12;19(12):e0315287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315287. eCollection 2024.
3
Case series of Li-Fraumeni syndrome: carcinogenic mechanisms in breast cancer with TP53 pathogenic variant carriers.
Li-Fraumeni 综合征病例系列:携带 TP53 致病性变异的乳腺癌的致癌机制。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Sep;31(5):988-996. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01612-3. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
4
Synthetic Reader-Actuators Targeted to Polycomb-Silenced Genes Block Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Proliferation and Invasion.靶向多梳沉默基因的合成读码器-致动器可阻断三阴性乳腺癌的增殖和侵袭。
GEN Biotechnol. 2023 Aug 1;2(4):301-316. doi: 10.1089/genbio.2023.0020. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
5
Determining prognostic factors and optimal surgical intervention for early-onset triple-negative breast cancer.确定早发性三阴性乳腺癌的预后因素及最佳手术干预措施。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 28;12:910765. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.910765. eCollection 2022.
6
Sociodemographic disparities in molecular testing for breast cancer.乳腺癌分子检测的社会人口统计学差异。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Jun;33(6):843-859. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01575-w. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Individual- and neighborhood-level socioeconomic status and risk of aggressive breast cancer subtypes in a pooled cohort of women from Kaiser Permanente Northern California.个体和社区层面的社会经济地位与 Kaiser Permanente 北加利福尼亚的女性队列中侵袭性乳腺癌亚型风险的相关性研究。
Cancer. 2021 Dec 15;127(24):4602-4612. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33861. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
8
Differences in Breast Cancer Presentation at Time of Diagnosis for Black and White Women in High Resource Settings.高资源环境下黑人和白人女性在诊断时乳腺癌表现的差异。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2021 Dec;23(6):1305-1342. doi: 10.1007/s10903-021-01161-3. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
Are there socio-economic inequalities in utilization of predictive biomarker tests and biological and precision therapies for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症预测生物标志物检测和生物及精准治疗的利用是否存在社会经济不平等?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 23;18(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01753-0.
10
Attenuation of p53 mutant as an approach for treatment Her2-positive cancer.抑制p53突变体作为治疗人表皮生长因子受体2阳性癌症的一种方法。
Cell Death Discov. 2020 Oct 10;6:100. doi: 10.1038/s41420-020-00337-4. eCollection 2020.