Integrity in scientific publishing.
作者信息
Rennie Drummond
出版信息
Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):885-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01088.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Integrity in scientific publishing.科学出版中的诚信。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):885-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01088.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
2
Historical model for editor and Office of Research Integrity cooperation in handling allegations, investigation, and retraction in a contentious (Abbs) case of research misconduct.编辑与研究诚信办公室在处理一起有争议的（阿布斯）研究不端案件中的指控、调查和撤稿事宜时的历史合作模式。
Account Res. 2015;22(2):63-80. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.901894.
3
Valediction from an old hand.
Nature. 1995 Dec 7;378(6557):521-3. doi: 10.1038/378521a0.
4
Reflections in honor of the contributions of Harold S. Luft: overview of the occasion.纪念哈罗德·S·卢夫特贡献的思考：活动概述
Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):848-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01087.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
5
A matter of trust: introducing the journal scientific integrity policy.信任问题：介绍本刊的科研诚信政策。
Am J Pathol. 2007 Jul;171(1):1. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070458.
6
Publication ethics and scientific misconduct: the role of authors.出版伦理与科研不端行为：作者的角色
J Orthod. 2008 Mar;35(1):1-4. doi: 10.1179/146531207225022347.
7
Challenges faced by journal editors.期刊编辑面临的挑战。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Mar;147(3):285-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.12.020.
8
Coping with peer rejection.应对同伴排斥。
Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):645. doi: 10.1038/425645a.
9
The Milbank Quarterly and health services research, 1977-1990.
Milbank Q. 1991;69(2):185-97.
10
Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.科学著者身份。第2部分。历史、反复出现的问题、实践及指南。
Mutat Res. 2005 Jan;589(1):31-45. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.002.
引用本文的文献
1
A Novel Individual Mentored Methodology to Peer Review for Residents/Fellows.一种新颖的个体化导师指导式住院医师/专科医师同行评议方法。
JSLS. 2021 Jul-Sep;25(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00036.
2
Integrity in research and publication.研究与出版中的诚信。
Malays Fam Physician. 2016 Aug 31;11(2-3):1. eCollection 2016.
3
Response to correspondence by Heather Lynch, Julie Goodman and Nancy Beck Re: "Application of the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology to the evidence for developmental and reproductive toxicity of triclosan".对希瑟·林奇、朱莉·古德曼和南希·贝克信件的回复 主题：“将导航指南系统评价方法应用于三氯生发育和生殖毒性证据”
Environ Int. 2017 May;102:76-78. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
4
The ICMJE Recommendations and pharmaceutical marketing--strengths, weaknesses and the unsolved problem of attribution in publication ethics.国际医学期刊编辑委员会（ICMJE）建议与药品营销——出版伦理中的优势、劣势及未解决的归因问题
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Apr 4;17:20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0103-7.
5
The Navigation Guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes.《导航指南》系统评价方法：一种将环境卫生科学转化为更好健康结果的严谨且透明的方法。
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Oct;122(10):1007-14. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307175. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
6
Authorship matrix: a rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific articles.作者贡献矩阵：一种量化多作者科学论文中个人贡献和责任的合理方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):345-61. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
7
Conrad and Becker's "10 Criteria" fall short of addressing conflicts of interest in chemical safety studies.康拉德和贝克尔的“10项标准”未能解决化学安全研究中的利益冲突问题。
Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Dec;119(12):A506-7; author reply A508-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104385.
8
An evidence-based medicine methodology to bridge the gap between clinical and environmental health sciences.循证医学方法学，弥合临床与环境卫生科学之间的差距。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 May;30(5):931-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1219.
9
Pulling back the curtain: improving reviews in environmental health.
Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Aug;118(8):a326-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002691.
本文引用的文献
1
Seeding trials: just say "no".接种试验：坚决说“不”。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 19;149(4):279-80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-4-200808190-00012.
2
The ADVANTAGE seeding trial: a review of internal documents.ADVANTAGE 植入试验：内部文件综述
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 19;149(4):251-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-4-200808190-00006.
3
Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: a case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation.与罗非昔布相关出版物中的客座作者身份和代笔行为：以罗非昔布诉讼中的行业文件为例
JAMA. 2008 Apr 16;299(15):1800-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.15.1800.
4
Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. 1979.手术应进行区域化吗？手术量与死亡率之间的实证关系。1979年。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Apr;457:3-9. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318034285e.
5
New policy on disclosures at Health Services Research.《卫生服务研究》中的披露新政策。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1721-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00656.x.
6
Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.科研不端行为、撤稿与医学文献净化：波埃尔曼案的教训
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):609-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00123. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
7
A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry.从社会科学视角看医药企业给医生的礼品。
JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):252-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.2.252.
8
Stopping medical research to save money: a broken pact with researchers and patients.
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2128-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.16.2128.
9
Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review.编辑同行评审的效果：一项系统评价
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2784-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2784.
10
Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication.第四届生物医学出版同行评审国际大会
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2759-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2759.
Zotero 插件