School of Engineering, Mercer University, Macon, GA.
JSLS. 2021 Jul-Sep;25(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00036.
Individualized guidance and assistance with constructive criticism as a mentored activity to peer review an article helps instill required rudiments, eliminate bad habits, and is shown to be beneficial to all participants. The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons initiated the R/F article mentoring review opportunity in 2014. The intimacy of actively debated discourse allows exposure to various peer review techniques and debate in tandem with education regarding the merits and faults of an article's hypothesis and conclusions, and how they are evaluated for publication and responses to authors. The benefits of coaching reassessment of ideas, critical analysis, airing of disparate viewpoints; and the need to update, reinforce, and relearn science is not static and is more robust using this method.
个体化指导和建设性批评作为指导活动，以帮助同行评审文章，有助于灌输必要的基础知识，消除不良习惯，并且对所有参与者都有益。腹腔镜和机器人外科医生学会于 2014 年发起了 R/F 文章指导审查机会。积极辩论的亲密性允许接触各种同行评审技术和辩论，同时教育有关文章假设和结论的优点和缺点，以及它们如何进行评估以发表和回应作者。指导重新评估想法、批判性分析、表达不同观点的好处；以及需要更新、加强和重新学习科学的必要性不是静态的，使用这种方法更加有效。
