Suppr超能文献

一种新颖的个体化导师指导式住院医师/专科医师同行评议方法。

A Novel Individual Mentored Methodology to Peer Review for Residents/Fellows.

机构信息

School of Engineering, Mercer University, Macon, GA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2021 Jul-Sep;25(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00036.

Abstract

Individualized guidance and assistance with constructive criticism as a mentored activity to peer review an article helps instill required rudiments, eliminate bad habits, and is shown to be beneficial to all participants. The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons initiated the R/F article mentoring review opportunity in 2014. The intimacy of actively debated discourse allows exposure to various peer review techniques and debate in tandem with education regarding the merits and faults of an article's hypothesis and conclusions, and how they are evaluated for publication and responses to authors. The benefits of coaching reassessment of ideas, critical analysis, airing of disparate viewpoints; and the need to update, reinforce, and relearn science is not static and is more robust using this method.

摘要

个体化指导和建设性批评作为指导活动,以帮助同行评审文章,有助于灌输必要的基础知识,消除不良习惯,并且对所有参与者都有益。腹腔镜和机器人外科医生学会于 2014 年发起了 R/F 文章指导审查机会。积极辩论的亲密性允许接触各种同行评审技术和辩论,同时教育有关文章假设和结论的优点和缺点,以及它们如何进行评估以发表和回应作者。指导重新评估想法、批判性分析、表达不同观点的好处;以及需要更新、加强和重新学习科学的必要性不是静态的,使用这种方法更加有效。

相似文献

3
Mentored peer reviewing for PhD faculty and students.为博士教员和学生提供指导下的同行评审。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Feb;37:1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.031. Epub 2015 Dec 12.

本文引用的文献

3
The state of the art in peer review.同行评审的当前技术水平。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018 Oct 1;365(19). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny204.
4
Ten Simple Rules for Effective Statistical Practice.有效统计实践的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jun 9;12(6):e1004961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004961. eCollection 2016 Jun.
6
P values: use and misuse in medical literature.P 值:在医学文献中的使用与误用。
Am J Hypertens. 2011 Jan;24(1):18-23. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.205. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
7
Integrity in scientific publishing.科学出版中的诚信。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):885-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01088.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
8
Why most published research findings are false.为何大多数已发表的研究结果是错误的。
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Epub 2005 Aug 30.
9
Scientists behaving badly.行为不端的科学家。
Nature. 2005 Jun 9;435(7043):737-8. doi: 10.1038/435737a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验