Suppr超能文献

经鼻胃管喂养和经皮内镜下胃造口术喂养头颈部癌症患者。

Nasogastric tube feeding and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer.

机构信息

Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Jun;23(3):277-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01047.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For patients with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer, oral nutrition may not provide adequate nutrition during radical radiotherapy or chemoradiation treatment, resulting in enteral feeding initiation. Enteral feeding may be delivered via a nasogastric tube or by a gastrostomy tube. The present study aimed to determine how different treatment modalities impact on requirement for enteral feeding and which method of enteral feeding provided the most benefit to the patient, as demonstrated by weight loss and the number of unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions.

METHODS

Patients who were treated with radical radiotherapy or chemoradiation between January 2004 and June 2007 were reviewed retrospectively (n = 196, male = 149, female = 47). Data were collected on demographics, diagnosis, T and N classification, nutritional status, unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions, and type and duration of enteral feeding. Subjects were divided into three subgroups depending on the treatment received. Comparisons were then made between methods of enteral feeding.

RESULTS

Combined modality treatment (Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiation) results in a higher proportion of patients requiring enteral feeding (66-71% compared to 12% for radiotherapy). Patients fed via a prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy lost the least amount of weight during treatment (-4.6% to +1.4%), although the method of enteral feeding did not statistically influence weight difference at the end of treatment. The enteral feeding method did not influence unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined modality treatment results in a greater requirement for enteral feeding, with these patient groups having the greatest weight loss. The findings obtained in the present study indicate that the method of enteral feeding did not statistically influence weight loss at the end of treatment or unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions.

摘要

背景

对于诊断为头颈部癌症的患者,在根治性放疗或放化疗期间,口服营养可能无法提供充足的营养,因此需要开始肠内营养。肠内营养可以通过鼻胃管或胃造口管提供。本研究旨在确定不同的治疗方式如何影响肠内营养的需求,以及哪种肠内营养方式能使患者受益最大,表现在体重减轻和计划外放疗中断的次数上。

方法

回顾性分析 2004 年 1 月至 2007 年 6 月期间接受根治性放疗或放化疗的患者(n=196,男性 149 例,女性 47 例)。收集人口统计学、诊断、T 和 N 分期、营养状况、计划外放疗中断和肠内营养类型和持续时间的数据。根据接受的治疗将患者分为三组,然后对肠内喂养方法进行比较。

结果

联合治疗(诱导化疗和放化疗)导致需要肠内喂养的患者比例较高(66-71%,而放疗为 12%)。通过预防性经皮内镜胃造口术喂养的患者在治疗期间体重减轻最少(-4.6%至+1.4%),尽管肠内喂养方式在治疗结束时对体重差异没有统计学影响。肠内喂养方式并不影响计划外放疗中断。

结论

联合治疗导致肠内喂养需求增加,这些患者群体体重减轻最多。本研究的结果表明,肠内喂养方式在治疗结束时对体重减轻或计划外放疗中断没有统计学影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验