• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达尔文与藤壶

Darwin and barnacles.

机构信息

Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Paris, France.

出版信息

C R Biol. 2010 Feb;333(2):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.11.009. Epub 2010 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.crvi.2009.11.009
PMID:20338525
Abstract

In this essay, I discuss the origin of Charles Darwin's interest in cirripedes (barnacles). Indeed, he worked intensively on cirripedes during the years in which he was developing the theory that eventually led to the publication of The Origin of Species. In the light of our present knowledge, I present Darwin's achievements in the morphology, systematics and biology of these small marine invertebrates, and also his mistakes. I suggest that the word that sheds the most light here is homology, and that his mistakes were due to following Richard Owen's method of determining homologies by reference to an ideal archetype. I discuss the ways in which his studies on cirripedes influenced the writing of The Origin.

摘要

在这篇文章中,我讨论了查尔斯·达尔文对藤壶(甲壳类动物)的兴趣的起源。事实上,在他发展最终导致《物种起源》出版的理论的那些年里,他曾对藤壶进行了深入的研究。根据我们目前的知识,我介绍了达尔文在这些小型海洋无脊椎动物的形态学、系统学和生物学方面的成就,以及他的错误。我认为,在这里最能说明问题的词是同源性,他的错误是由于遵循理查德·欧文的通过参考理想原型来确定同源性的方法。我讨论了他对藤壶的研究如何影响《物种起源》的写作。

相似文献

1
Darwin and barnacles.达尔文与藤壶
C R Biol. 2010 Feb;333(2):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.11.009. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
2
Darwin and the cirripedes: Insights and dreadful blunders.达尔文与蔓足类动物:见解与严重失误
Integr Zool. 2009 Sep;4(3):316-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2009.00173.x.
3
Darwin's "Mr. Arthrobalanus": Sexual Differentiation, Evolutionary Destiny and the Expert Eye of the Beholder.达尔文的“节肢动物先生”:性别分化、进化命运与观察者的专业眼光
J Hist Biol. 2017 May;50(2):315-355. doi: 10.1007/s10739-016-9444-9.
4
"I would sooner die than give up": Huxley and Darwin's deep disagreement.“我宁死也不放弃”:赫胥黎与达尔文的深刻分歧。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Apr 9;43(2):53. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00409-3.
5
Darwin's "beloved barnacles": tough lessons in variation.达尔文的“心爱藤壶”:变异的艰难教训。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2011;33(1):51-70.
6
Of trees, geese and cirripedes: man's quest for understanding.关于树木、鹅与蔓足类动物:人类对理解的追求。
Integr Zool. 2011 Mar;6(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00225.x.
7
An Amphibious Being: How Maritime Surveying Reshaped Darwin's Approach to Natural History.一种两栖生物:海洋勘测如何重塑达尔文的自然史研究方法。
Isis. 2016 Jun;107(2):254-81. doi: 10.1086/687218.
8
Between the Beagle and the barnacle: Darwin's microscopy, 1837-1854.在小猎犬号与藤壶之间:达尔文的显微镜学,1837 - 1854年
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2009 Dec;40(4):382-95. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.10.007.
9
Sexual selection: Another Darwinian process.性选择:另一种达尔文过程。
C R Biol. 2010 Feb;333(2):134-44. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Feb 7.
10
Did Jean François Barbe Anticipate Charles Darwin?让·弗朗索瓦·巴尔贝是否早于查尔斯·达尔文?
Vesalius. 2016 Dec;22(2):24-29.

引用本文的文献

1
: Furthering our understanding of animals.增进我们对动物的了解。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 1;10(24):e39932. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39932. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.
2
The "plant neurobiology" revolution.植物神经生物学革命。
Plant Signal Behav. 2024 Dec 31;19(1):2345413. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2024.2345413. Epub 2024 May 6.
3
Convergent evolution of barnacles and molluscs sheds lights in origin and diversification of calcareous shell and sessile lifestyle.藤壶和软体动物的趋同进化揭示了钙质外壳和固着生活方式的起源和多样化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 14;289(1982):20221535. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1535.
4
Chromosome-level genome assembly, annotation, and phylogenomics of the gooseneck barnacle Pollicipes pollicipes.鹅颈藤壶的染色体水平基因组组装、注释和系统发育基因组学研究。
Gigascience. 2022 Mar 12;11. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giac021.