Suppr超能文献

单倍体还是二倍体:哪种更好?

Haploidy or diploidy: which is better?

作者信息

Kondrashov A S, Crow J F

机构信息

Research Computer Center, Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, USSR.

出版信息

Nature. 1991 May 23;351(6324):314-5. doi: 10.1038/351314a0.

Abstract

Although the evolutionary advantages of sexual reproduction have been extensively discussed, much less attention has been paid to haploid and diploid phases of the sexual life cycle. The relative lengths of these phases differ greatly in various taxa, including as extremes those with one or the other phase reduced to a single cell. Here we consider the efficiency of elimination of deleterious mutations as an evolutionary force and compare the mutation loads under haploid and diploid selection, Ln and L2n. With truncation-like selection, partial dominance, and heterozygous effect of a mutation less than about 1/4 its hemizygous effect, L2n less than Ln; otherwise L2n greater than Ln. The difference becomes important when the genomic deleterious mutation rate exceeds about 1 per genome. This suggests that the mutation rate, degree of dominance and mode of selection can be important in life-cycle evolution.

摘要

尽管有性生殖的进化优势已被广泛讨论,但对有性生活周期中的单倍体和二倍体阶段关注较少。这些阶段的相对长度在不同分类群中差异很大,极端情况下,其中一个阶段会缩减为单个细胞。在这里,我们将有害突变的消除效率视为一种进化力量,并比较单倍体和二倍体选择下的突变负荷,即Ln和L2n。在类似截断的选择、部分显性以及突变的杂合效应小于其半合子效应的约1/4的情况下,L2n小于Ln;否则L2n大于Ln。当基因组有害突变率超过约每基因组1个时,这种差异就变得很重要。这表明突变率、显性程度和选择模式在生命周期进化中可能很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验