Suppr超能文献

三种双侧矢状劈开截骨术的外侧骨切开设计:三维有限元分析的生物力学评估。

Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Head Face Med. 2010 Mar 26;6:4. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-6-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The location of the lateral osteotomy cut during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) varies according to the surgeon's preference, and no consensus has been reached regarding the ideal location from the perspective of biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of the mandible and screw-miniplate system among three lateral osteotomy designs for BSSO by using three-dimensional (3-D) finite element analysis (FEA).

METHODS

The Trauner-Obwegeser (TO), Obwegeser (Ob), and Obwegeser-Dal Pont (OD) methods were used for BSSO. In all the FEA simulations, the distal segments were advanced by 5 mm. Each model was fixed by using miniplates. These were applied at four different locations, including along Champy's lines, to give 12 different FEA miniplate fixation methods. We examined these models under two different loads.

RESULTS

The magnitudes of tooth displacement, the maximum bone stress in the vicinity of the screws, and the maximum stress on the screw-miniplate system were less in the OD method than in the Ob and TO methods at all the miniplate locations. In addition, Champy's lines models were less than those at the other miniplate locations.

CONCLUSIONS

The OD method allows greater mechanical stability of the mandible than the other two techniques. Further, miniplates placed along Champy's lines provide greater mechanical advantage than those placed at other locations.

摘要

背景

双侧矢状劈开截骨术(BSSO)中,外侧截骨线的位置因术者偏好而异,从生物力学的角度来看,还没有达成关于理想位置的共识。本研究旨在通过三维有限元分析(FEA)评估三种 BSSO 外侧截骨设计的下颌骨和螺钉-微型板系统的力学行为。

方法

采用 Trauner-Obwegeser(TO)、Obwegeser(Ob)和 Obwegeser-Dal Pont(OD)方法进行 BSSO。在所有的 FEA 模拟中,远端节段均向前移动 5mm。每个模型均通过微型板固定。微型板固定于四个不同位置,包括 Champy 线,共有 12 种不同的 FEA 微型板固定方法。我们在两种不同载荷下对这些模型进行了研究。

结果

在所有微型板位置,OD 法的牙位移量、螺钉附近最大骨应力和螺钉-微型板系统的最大应力均小于 Ob 法和 TO 法;此外,Champy 线模型的数值小于其他微型板位置的模型。

结论

OD 法比其他两种技术更能增强下颌骨的稳定性。此外,沿 Champy 线放置的微型板比其他位置的微型板提供更大的机械优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/272c/2853503/3369eb15554b/1746-160X-6-4-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验