House Ear Institute and House Ear Clinic, Los Angeles, California 90057, USA.
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jun;31(4):665-70. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d2f021.
To review the clinical presentation, evaluation, and management of 18 patients with geniculate ganglion hemangiomas seen at the House Clinic.
Retrospective case review.
Private neurotological tertiary referral center.
Eighteen patients with geniculate ganglion hemangiomas treated at the House Clinic between 1986 and 2008.
Observation or surgical intervention using the middle fossa or translabyrinthine craniotomy for decompression or excision of the hemangioma with or without facial nerve resection and grafting.
Postoperative facial function using the House-Brackmann grading system, postoperative audiograms and postoperative follow-up magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomographic scan of the temporal bone.
Approximately 13 patients (72%) were female subjects, and 5 (28%) were male subjects. Mean age was 54 years, and follow-up was 73 months. 17 (94%) of 18 patients presented with facial paresis or paralysis. Facial twitching was present in 10 (56%) of 18 cases. Four patients (22%) presented with hearing loss. Facial nerve function was House-Brackmann grade I/II in 7(38%), III/IV in 5 (28%), and V/VI in 6 (34%) patients, respectively. Approximately 13 patients (72%) underwent middle fossa craniotomy for excision or decompression of their hemangiomas, and 2 (11%) underwent translabyrinthine removal. The facial nerve was preserved in 11 (73%) of 15 patients and was excised and grafted in 4 (27%) of 15. Recovery to a House-Brackmann grade I/II was seen in 8 (72%) of 11 patients in whom the integrity of the facial nerve was preserved. In the surgical group, hearing remained stable in 64% of hearing preservation cases and worsened in 38%. Facial function remained stable in the nonsurgical group.
Geniculate ganglion hemangiomas are rare vascular malformations that produce facial paralysis despite their relative small size at presentation. When possible, excision with neural preservation yields better long-term facial function. Recurrences are rare.
回顾在 House 诊所就诊的 18 例膝状神经节血管瘤患者的临床表现、评估和治疗方法。
回顾性病例分析。
私人神经耳科三级转诊中心。
1986 年至 2008 年在 House 诊所接受治疗的 18 例膝状神经节血管瘤患者。
观察或采用中颅窝或经迷路颅底切开术进行减压或切除血管瘤,同时或不切除面神经并进行移植。
术后 House-Brackmann 分级系统评估的面神经功能,术后听力图以及术后颞骨磁共振成像或计算机断层扫描。
大约 13 例(72%)患者为女性,5 例(28%)为男性。平均年龄为 54 岁,随访时间为 73 个月。18 例患者中有 17 例(94%)表现为面瘫或面肌瘫痪。18 例中有 10 例(56%)存在面肌抽搐。4 例(22%)患者存在听力损失。术后面神经功能分别为 House-Brackmann Ⅰ/Ⅱ级 7 例(38%),Ⅲ/Ⅳ级 5 例(28%),Ⅴ/Ⅵ级 6 例(34%)。大约 13 例(72%)患者接受中颅窝颅底切开术切除或减压其血管瘤,2 例(11%)患者接受经迷路切除术。15 例患者中有 11 例(73%)面神经得以保留,4 例(27%)面神经被切除并移植。在保留面神经的 11 例患者中,有 8 例(72%)恢复至 House-Brackmann Ⅰ/Ⅱ级。在手术组中,听力保留病例中听力稳定占 64%,恶化占 38%。非手术组面神经功能稳定。
尽管膝状神经节血管瘤在出现时体积相对较小,但仍会引起面瘫,是一种罕见的血管畸形。在可能的情况下,切除并保留神经可获得更好的长期面神经功能。复发罕见。