Hegde Mithra N, Hegde Priyadarshini, Shetty Veena, Sampath Pavitra B
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, India.
J Conserv Dent. 2008 Oct;11(4):150-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.48838.
To evaluate and compare the antibacterial activity of polymerized, two-step, self-etching and one-step, self-etching adhesive systems by using the direct contact test after one, seven, and fourteen days.
The direct contact test was used to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Clearfil Protect Bond, Adper SE Plus, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Easy One on Streptococcus mutans after aging the samples in phosphate-buffered saline for one, seven, and fourteen days. Statistical analysis included the one-way Anova and Tukey's multiple comparison tests.
Among the tested materials, Clearfil Protect Bond exhibited an antibacterial effect for seven days when in contact with S. mutans. None of the adhesive systems exhibited any antibacterial effect after 14 days.
The incorporation of antibacterial agents into dentine-bonding agents may become an essential factor in inhibiting residual bacteria in the cavity following a cavity disinfection procedure, and it could be recommended in situations where total disinfection of cavity is not accomplished due to lack of accessibility.
通过在1天、7天和14天后使用直接接触试验,评估和比较聚合型、两步自酸蚀和一步自酸蚀粘结系统的抗菌活性。
将Clearfil Protect Bond、Adper SE Plus、Clearfil SE Bond和Adper Easy One样本在磷酸盐缓冲盐水中老化1天、7天和14天后,采用直接接触试验评估其对变形链球菌的抗菌活性。统计分析包括单因素方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验。
在测试材料中,Clearfil Protect Bond与变形链球菌接触时在7天内表现出抗菌效果。14天后,所有粘结系统均未表现出任何抗菌效果。
在牙本质粘结剂中加入抗菌剂可能成为抑制窝洞消毒程序后窝洞内残留细菌的一个重要因素,在因难以完全消毒窝洞的情况下可推荐使用。