University of Guarulhos, Dental Research and Graduate Studies Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, SP, Brazil.
Oper Dent. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):448-53. doi: 10.2341/09-297-L.
The antibacterial properties of self-etching adhesive systems constitute an important issue in operative dentistry, since viable bacteria can still be present after cavity preparation. The current study evaluated the antibacterial activity of five one-step self-etching adhesives (SEAs) and four self-etching primers (SEPs) against oral streptococci. Clearfil S3 (S3), One-Up Bond F Plus (OU), Futurabond NR (FB), GBond (GB), Xeno IV (X4), Clearfil SE Bond (SE), Clearfil Protect Bond (PB), Adper SE Plus (AS) and AdheSE (AD) were tested for antibacterial activity against five streptococci species: S oralis, S sanguinis, S cricetus, S mutans and S sobrinus. Chlorhexidine (0.12%) and phosphoric acid (37%) gel were used as control. The agar diffusion test method was used. Plates containing BHI agar and 300 uL of bacterial cell suspension (0.5 MacFarland) were prepared. Holes 6 mm in diameter were made and partially filled with bacteriological agar. Then, 10 uL of each SEA or SEP was dropped and the plates were incubated under microaerophilic atmosphere at 37 degrees C for 48 hours and the diameter of each halo was registered. The results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test. PB exhibited the most effective antibacterial activity against oral streptococci. The performances of SE and FB were similar or better than chlorhexidine for all bacteria. S3, X4, AS, AD, OU and GB showed significantly lower inhibition values. Among the species tested, S oralis was the most sensitive to all self-etching adhesive systems; on the other hand, S cricetus, S mutans and S sobrinus were more resistant. Among the self-etching adhesive systems evaluated, Clearfil Protect Bond exhibited the most effective antibacterial activity against oral streptococci.
自酸蚀粘接剂的抗菌性能是口腔修复学中的一个重要问题,因为在窝洞预备后仍可能存在存活的细菌。本研究评估了五种一步法自酸蚀粘接剂(SEAs)和四种自酸蚀底胶(SEPs)对口腔链球菌的抗菌活性。Clearfil S3(S3)、One-Up Bond F Plus(OU)、Futurabond NR(FB)、GBond(GB)、Xeno IV(X4)、Clearfil SE Bond(SE)、Clearfil Protect Bond(PB)、Adper SE Plus(AS)和 AdheSE(AD)对五种链球菌(S oralis、S sanguinis、S cricetus、S mutans 和 S sobrinus)进行了抗菌活性测试。氯己定(0.12%)和磷酸(37%)凝胶作为对照。采用琼脂扩散试验法。制备含有 BHI 琼脂和 300 μL 细菌细胞悬浮液(0.5 MacFarland)的平板。用直径 6mm 的打孔器打孔,部分填满细菌琼脂。然后,在每个 SEA 或 SEP 中滴加 10μL,在微需氧条件下于 37°C 孵育 48 小时,并记录每个晕环的直径。采用双因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验对结果进行分析。PB 对口腔链球菌表现出最强的抗菌活性。SE 和 FB 对所有细菌的性能与氯己定相似或优于氯己定。S3、X4、AS、AD、OU 和 GB 显示出明显较低的抑制值。在所测试的物种中,S oralis 对所有自酸蚀粘接系统最敏感;另一方面,S cricetus、S mutans 和 S sobrinus 对这些粘接系统的抵抗力更强。在评估的自酸蚀粘接系统中,Clearfil Protect Bond 对口腔链球菌表现出最强的抗菌活性。