Department of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland.
Department of Microbiology and Laboratory Medical Immunology, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland.
Molecules. 2019 Feb 1;24(3):532. doi: 10.3390/molecules24030532.
There is no consensus on the antibacterial activity of dentin bonding systems (DBS). Many study models have been used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of dental materials. In this study, a novel detection method, flow cytometry, was introduced. It allows for evaluation of the antibacterial activity of DBS, based on assessment of the disruption of the bacterial physical membrane induced by DBS. The aim of the study was to evaluate the antibacterial properties of selected dentin bonding systems against . The highest antibacterial activity against was observed for Adhese Universal (99.68% dead cells) and was comparable to that of Prime&Bond Universal, OptiBond Universal, or Clearfil Universal Bond Quick ( > 0.05). The lowest activity of all tested systems was displayed by the multi-mode adhesive, Universal Bond (12.68% dead bacteria cells), followed by the self-etch adhesive, OptiBond FL (15.58% dead bacteria cells). The present study showed that in the case of two-component DBS, the primer exhibited higher antimicrobial activity than the adhesive (or bond) itself.
关于牙本质粘接系统(DBS)的抗菌活性尚无定论。许多研究模型已被用于评估牙科材料的抗菌活性。在这项研究中,引入了一种新的检测方法,即流式细胞术。它可以根据 DBS 对细菌物理膜的破坏程度来评估 DBS 的抗菌活性。本研究旨在评估选定的牙本质粘接系统对 的抗菌性能。Adhese Universal(99.68%死亡细胞)对 的抗菌活性最高,与 Prime&Bond Universal、OptiBond Universal 或 Clearfil Universal Bond Quick(>0.05)相当。所有测试系统中活性最低的是多模式粘合剂 Universal Bond(12.68%死亡细菌细胞),其次是自酸蚀粘合剂 OptiBond FL(15.58%死亡细菌细胞)。本研究表明,对于双组分 DBS,底漆的抗菌活性高于胶粘剂(或胶)本身。