Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Aug;18(8):960-4. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.39. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
Complex diseases invariably involve multiple genes and often exhibit variable symptom profiles. The extent to which disease symptoms, course, and severity differ between affected individuals may result from underlying genetic heterogeneity. Genes with modifier effects may or may not also influence disease susceptibility. In this study, we have simulated data in which a subset of cases differ by some effect size (ES) on a quantitative trait and are also enriched for a risk allele. Power to detect this 'pseudo-modifier' gene in case-only and case-control designs was explored blind to case substructure. Simulations involved 1000 iterations and calculations for 80% power at P<0.01 while varying the risk allele frequency (RAF), sample size (SS), ES, odds ratio (OR), and proportions of the case subgroups. With realistic values for the RAF (0.20), SS (3000) and ES (1), an OR of 1.7 is necessary to detect a pseudo-modifier gene. Unequal numbers of subjects in the case groups result in little decrement in power until the group enriched for the risk allele is <30% or >70% of the total case population. In practice, greater numbers of subjects and selection of a quantitative trait with a large range will provide researchers with greater power to detect a pseudo-modifier gene. However, even under ideal conditions, studies involving alleles with low frequencies or low ORs are usually underpowered for detection of a modifier or susceptibility gene. This may explain some of the inconsistent association results for many candidate gene studies of complex diseases.
复杂疾病通常涉及多个基因,并且常常表现出不同的症状特征。受影响个体之间疾病症状、病程和严重程度的差异可能是由于潜在的遗传异质性所致。具有修饰效应的基因可能会或可能不会影响疾病易感性。在这项研究中,我们模拟了数据,其中一部分病例在某种数量性状上的效应大小(ES)有所不同,并且还富集了风险等位基因。在不了解病例亚结构的情况下,我们探讨了病例仅和病例对照设计中检测这种“伪修饰基因”的能力。模拟涉及 1000 次迭代和 80%的功效计算,在 P<0.01 时,风险等位基因频率(RAF)、样本量(SS)、ES、优势比(OR)和病例亚组的比例发生变化。对于现实的 RAF(0.20)、SS(3000)和 ES(1)值,需要 OR 为 1.7 才能检测到伪修饰基因。病例组中受试者数量的不平衡只会导致功效略有下降,直到富集风险等位基因的组占总病例人群的<30%或>70%。实际上,更多的受试者数量和选择具有较大范围的数量性状将为研究人员提供更大的检测伪修饰基因的能力。然而,即使在理想条件下,涉及低频或低 OR 等位基因的研究通常也无法检测到修饰或易感基因。这可能解释了许多复杂疾病候选基因研究中不一致的关联结果的一些原因。