Advanced Water Management Centre, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4072, Australia.
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 May 1;44(9):3629-37. doi: 10.1021/es100125h.
Existing wastewater treatment options are generally perceived as energy intensive and environmentally unfriendly. Much attention has been focused on two new approaches in the past years, (i) microbial fuel cells and (ii) microbial electrolysis cells, which directly generate electrical current or chemical products, respectively, during wastewater treatment. These systems are commonly denominated as bioelectrochemical systems, and a multitude of claims have been made in the past regarding the environmental impact of these treatment options. However, an in-depth study backing these claims has not been performed. Here, we have conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare the environmental impact of three industrial wastewater treatment options, (i) anaerobic treatment with biogas generation, (ii) a microbial fuel cell treatment, with direct electricity generation, and (iii) a microbial electrolysis cell, with hydrogen peroxide production. Our analysis showed that a microbial fuel cell does not provide a significant environmental benefit relative to the "conventional" anaerobic treatment option. However, a microbial electrolysis cell provides significant environmental benefits through the displacement of chemical production by conventional means. Provided that the target conversion level of 1000 A.m(-3) can be met, the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions and other environmentally harmful emissions (e.g., aromatic hydrocarbons) of the microbial electrolysis cell will be a key driver for the development of an industrial standard for this technology. Evidently, this assessment is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions, such as the used reactor materials and target performance. This provides a challenge and an opportunity for researchers in the field to select and develop appropriate and environmentally benign materials of construction, as well as demonstrate the required 1000 A.m(-3) performance at pilot and full scale.
现有的废水处理方法通常被认为是能源密集型且对环境不友好的。在过去的几年中,人们关注了两种新方法,(i)微生物燃料电池和(ii)微生物电解池,它们分别在废水处理过程中直接产生电流或化学产品。这些系统通常被称为生物电化学系统,过去曾提出过许多关于这些处理方法的环境影响的说法。然而,没有对这些说法进行深入的研究。在这里,我们进行了生命周期评估(LCA),以比较三种工业废水处理方法的环境影响,(i)带有沼气生成的厌氧处理,(ii)直接产生电能的微生物燃料电池处理,和(iii)生产过氧化氢的微生物电解池。我们的分析表明,微生物燃料电池相对于“传统”的厌氧处理方法并没有提供显著的环境效益。然而,微生物电解池通过用传统方法替代化学生产提供了显著的环境效益。只要可以达到 1000 A.m(-3) 的目标转化率,微生物电解池的温室气体排放和其他环境有害排放(例如芳香烃)的减少将成为该技术工业标准发展的关键驱动因素。显然,这种评估高度依赖于基础假设,例如所使用的反应器材料和目标性能。这为该领域的研究人员提供了一个挑战和机会,可以选择和开发合适的、环境友好的结构材料,并在中试和全规模水平上展示所需的 1000 A.m(-3) 性能。