Department of Speech Communication Arts and Sciences, Brooklyn College Brooklyn, New York, USA.
J Voice. 2010 Nov;24(6):637-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.06.001. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
Vocal fold hydration is purported to promote optimal biomechanical characteristics of vocal fold mucosa, increase efficiency of vocal fold oscillation, and enhance voice quality. The purpose of this work was to determine the magnitude and consistency of the effect of vocal fold hydration on vocal fold function across published clinical studies.
We completed a comprehensive meta-analysis of the effects of superficial and systemic vocal fold hydration on phonation threshold pressure (PTP), a measure of efficiency of voice production.
We identified 34 studies that examined the effects of hydration on vocal function. Of these studies, 14 examined the effects of hydration on PTP. Nine of these articles met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis. We observed an average effect size of 0.33, indicating that, overall, hydration treatment demonstrated a tendency to reduce PTP. However, this decrease in phonatory effort did not reach significance at the 95% confidence level. The effects of hydration intervention varied considerably across studies (-0.19 to 3.96). We considered that two factors, pitch level of the task and vocal health of participants, may have contributed to this variability in findings. However, our analysis found that these factors could not account for differences in effect size.
To understand the variability in outcomes across studies, the role of factors that may impact the effects of hydration, such as the amount, type, and duration of intervention, must be determined. Only then can we obtain data to guide best clinical practice for protecting and rehabilitating vocal function.
声带水合作用据称可促进声带黏膜的最佳生物力学特性,提高声带振动效率,并改善嗓音质量。本研究旨在确定声带水合作用对声带功能的影响在已发表的临床研究中的幅度和一致性。
我们对声带表面和全身水合作用对发声阈值压力(PTP)的影响进行了全面的荟萃分析,PTP 是衡量发声效率的指标。
我们确定了 34 项研究,这些研究检查了水合作用对声带功能的影响。其中 14 项研究检查了水合作用对 PTP 的影响。其中 9 篇文章符合纳入本分析的标准。我们观察到平均效应大小为 0.33,表明总体而言,水合作用治疗倾向于降低 PTP。然而,这种发声努力的减少在 95%置信水平下并未达到显著水平。水合干预的效果在研究之间差异很大(-0.19 至 3.96)。我们认为两个因素,即任务的音高水平和参与者的嗓音健康,可能导致了这些发现的变异性。然而,我们的分析发现,这些因素不能解释效应大小的差异。
为了理解研究结果的变异性,必须确定可能影响水合作用效果的因素的作用,例如干预的量、类型和持续时间。只有这样,我们才能获得数据来指导保护和恢复声带功能的最佳临床实践。