Ryan Cormac G, Gray Heather G, Newton Mary, Granat Malcolm H
School of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland G4 0BA, UK.
Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):382-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
The aim of this single-blind pilot RCT was to investigate the effect of pain biology education and group exercise classes compared to pain biology education alone for individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Participants with CLBP were randomised to a pain biology education and group exercise classes group (EDEX) [n = 20] or a pain biology education only group (ED) [n = 18]. The primary outcome was pain (0-100 numerical rating scale), and self-reported function assessed using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, measured at pre-intervention, post-intervention and three month follow up. Secondary outcome measures were pain self-efficacy, pain related fear, physical performance testing and free-living activity monitoring. Using a linear mixed model analysis, there was a statistically significant interaction effect between time and intervention for both pain (F[2,49] = 3.975, p < 0.05) and pain self-efficacy (F[2,51] = 4.011, p < 0.05) with more favourable results for the ED group. The effects levelled off at the three month follow up point. In the short term, pain biology education alone was more effective for pain and pain self-efficacy than a combination of pain biology education and group exercise classes. This pilot study highlights the need to investigate the combined effects of different interventions.
这项单盲试验性随机对照试验的目的是,研究与单独进行疼痛生物学教育相比,疼痛生物学教育和团体运动课程对慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的影响。CLBP患者被随机分为疼痛生物学教育和团体运动课程组(EDEX)[n = 20]或仅疼痛生物学教育组(ED)[n = 18]。主要结局指标为疼痛(0-100数字评分量表),以及使用罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷评估的自我报告功能,在干预前、干预后和三个月随访时进行测量。次要结局指标为疼痛自我效能感、疼痛相关恐惧、身体性能测试和日常活动监测。使用线性混合模型分析,疼痛(F[2,49] = 3.975,p < 0.05)和疼痛自我效能感(F[2,51] = 4.011,p < 0.05)在时间和干预之间均存在统计学上显著的交互作用,ED组的结果更有利。在三个月随访点时效果趋于平稳。短期内,单独的疼痛生物学教育在疼痛和疼痛自我效能感方面比疼痛生物学教育与团体运动课程相结合更有效。这项试验性研究强调了研究不同干预措施联合效果的必要性。