Grant John A, Mohtadi Nicholas G H
University of Calgary Sport Medicine Center, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4.
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1389-94. doi: 10.1177/0363546509359763. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
There have been no long-term follow-up studies comparing a predominantly home-based rehabilitation program with a standard physical therapy program after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Demonstrating the long-term success of such a cost-effective program would be beneficial to guide future rehabilitation practice.
To determine whether there were any differences in long-term outcome between recreational athletes who performed a physical therapy-supervised rehabilitation program and those who performed a primarily home-based rehabilitation program in the first 3 months after ACL reconstruction.
Randomized clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Patients were randomized before ACL reconstruction surgery to either the physical therapy-supervised (17 physical therapy sessions) or home-based (4 physical therapy sessions) program. Eighty-eight of the original 129 patients returned 2 to 4 years after surgery to assess their long-term clinical outcomes. Primary outcome was the ACL quality of life questionnaire (ACL QOL). Secondary outcomes were bilateral difference in knee extension and flexion range of motion, sagittal plane knee laxity, relative quadriceps and hamstring strength, and objective International Knee Documentation Committee score. Unpaired t tests and a chi-square test were used for the comparisons.
The home-based group had a significantly higher mean ACL QOL score (80.0 +/- 16.2) than the physical therapy-supervised group (69.9 +/- 22.0) a mean of 38 months after surgery (P = .02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7, 18.4). The mean change in ACL QOL score from before surgery to follow-up was not significantly different between the groups (physical therapy = 40.0, home = 45.8, P = .26, 95% CI: -15.8, 4.4). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcome measures.
This long-term study upholds the short-term findings of the original randomized clinical trial by demonstrating that patients who participate in a predominantly home-based rehabilitation program in the first 3 months after ACL reconstruction have similar 2- to 4-year outcomes compared with those patients who participate in a more clinically supervised program.
目前尚无关于前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后以家庭为主的康复计划与标准物理治疗计划的长期随访研究。证明这种具有成本效益的计划的长期成功性将有助于指导未来的康复实践。
确定在ACL重建术后的前3个月内,接受物理治疗师监督的康复计划的休闲运动员与主要接受家庭康复计划的运动员在长期结果上是否存在差异。
随机临床试验;证据等级,1级。
患者在ACL重建手术前被随机分为物理治疗师监督组(17次物理治疗)或家庭康复组(4次物理治疗)。原始的129名患者中有88名在术后2至4年返回评估其长期临床结果。主要结果是ACL生活质量问卷(ACL QOL)。次要结果包括双侧膝关节屈伸活动范围差异、矢状面膝关节松弛度、股四头肌和腘绳肌相对力量,以及客观的国际膝关节文献委员会评分。采用非配对t检验和卡方检验进行比较。
术后平均38个月时,家庭康复组的平均ACL QOL评分(80.0±16.2)显著高于物理治疗师监督组(69.9±22.0)(P = .02,95%置信区间[CI]:1.7,18.4)。两组从手术前到随访时ACL QOL评分的平均变化无显著差异(物理治疗组 = 40.0,家庭康复组 = 45.8,P = .26,95% CI:-15.8,4.4)。次要结果指标无显著差异。
这项长期研究证实了原始随机临床试验的短期结果,表明在ACL重建术后的前3个月内主要接受家庭康复计划的患者与接受更多临床监督计划的患者相比,在2至4年的结果相似。