Iacobellis Claudio, Berizzi Antonio, Aldegheri Roberto
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2010 Apr;5(1):17-22. doi: 10.1007/s11751-010-0085-9. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
We present the results of treatment of 100 patients (72 men, 28 women) by the Ilizarov method of bone transport using circular (55) and monolateral external fixators (45). A total of 26 femurs (18 monolateral, 8 circular) and 74 tibias (49 circular, 25 monolateral) was examined. There were no significant differences between the circular fixator and the monolateral fixator with regard to treatment time, complications in the treated bone segments or compliance with the presence of the fixator. The main complications (pseudoarthrosis at bone contact points after transport, insufficient ossification of lengthened bone, knee stiffness) were resolved with further treatment for all patients with the exception of one case which continued with repeated infections. The circular fixator allows for deformity corrections during bone transport but the monolateral fixator is tolerated better by patients, especially in those with femoral defects.
我们展示了采用环形(55例)和单侧外固定器(45例)通过伊利扎洛夫骨搬运方法治疗100例患者(72例男性,28例女性)的结果。共检查了26根股骨(18根单侧,8根环形)和74根胫骨(49根环形,25根单侧)。在治疗时间、治疗骨段的并发症或固定器的依从性方面,环形固定器和单侧固定器之间没有显著差异。除1例持续反复感染外,所有患者的主要并发症(搬运后骨接触点假关节、延长骨骨化不足、膝关节僵硬)经进一步治疗后均得到解决。环形固定器可在骨搬运过程中进行畸形矫正,但患者对单侧固定器的耐受性更好,尤其是在股骨缺损患者中。