• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠道子宫内膜异位症的术前评估:经阴道超声与直肠水造影、经直肠超声及钡灌肠的比较

Preoperative assessment of intestinal endometriosis: A comparison of transvaginal sonography with water-contrast in the rectum, transrectal sonography, and barium enema.

作者信息

Bergamini Valentino, Ghezzi Fabio, Scarperi Stefano, Raffaelli Ricciarda, Cromi Antonella, Franchi Massimo

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Abdom Imaging. 2010 Dec;35(6):732-6. doi: 10.1007/s00261-010-9610-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-010-9610-z
PMID:20364253
Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of Transrectal Sonography (TRS) and a new technique, Transvaginal Sonography with Water-Contrast in the Rectum (RWC-TVS), in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis, and the accuracy of Barium Enema (BE) and RWC-TVS in the detection of intestinal stenosis due to endometriosis. In a prospective study, we compared the findings of TRS and RWC-TVS performed before surgery with the operative and pathologic findings in 61 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy for suspected rectosigmoid endometriosis. The accuracy of BE and RWC-TVS in the detection of intestinal stenosis was evaluated comparing the radiologic and ultrasonographic results with the macroscopic findings at surgery and pathology. RWC-TVS diagnosed rectosigmoid endometriosis with the same accuracy of TRS and was equally efficient as BE in the detection of a significant intestinal lumen stenosis. For the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of TRS and RWC-TVS were 88.2% and 96%, 80%, and 90%, 95.7%, and 98%, and 57.1% and 81.8%, respectively. For the detection of intestinal stenosis the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of BE and RWC-TVS were 93.7% and 87.5%, 94.2% and 91.4%, 88.2% and 82.3%, and 97% and 94.1%, respectively. RWC-TVS is a new, simple technique for a single-step and accurate preoperative assessment of rectosigmoid endometriosis.

摘要

为评估经直肠超声检查(TRS)以及一种新技术——直肠水造影经阴道超声检查(RWC-TVS)在诊断直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症方面的准确性,以及钡剂灌肠(BE)和RWC-TVS在检测子宫内膜异位症所致肠道狭窄方面的准确性。在一项前瞻性研究中,我们将61例因疑似直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症而接受腹腔镜检查或剖腹手术的连续患者术前进行的TRS和RWC-TVS检查结果与手术及病理结果进行了比较。通过将放射学和超声检查结果与手术及病理的宏观检查结果进行比较,评估了BE和RWC-TVS在检测肠道狭窄方面的准确性。RWC-TVS诊断直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症的准确性与TRS相同,在检测明显的肠腔狭窄方面与BE同样有效。对于直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症的诊断,TRS和RWC-TVS的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为88.2%和96%、80%和90%、95.7%和98%、57.1%和81.8%。对于肠道狭窄的检测,BE和RWC-TVS的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为93.7%和87.5%、94.2%和91.4%、88.2%和82.3%、97%和94.1%。RWC-TVS是一种用于直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症术前单步准确评估的新的简单技术。

相似文献

1
Preoperative assessment of intestinal endometriosis: A comparison of transvaginal sonography with water-contrast in the rectum, transrectal sonography, and barium enema.肠道子宫内膜异位症的术前评估:经阴道超声与直肠水造影、经直肠超声及钡灌肠的比较
Abdom Imaging. 2010 Dec;35(6):732-6. doi: 10.1007/s00261-010-9610-z.
2
Magnetic resonance enema vs rectal water-contrast transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis.磁共振灌肠造影与直肠水造影经阴道超声检查在直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症诊断中的应用比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;49(4):524-532. doi: 10.1002/uog.15934.
3
Comparison of transvaginal sonography and double-contrast barium enema for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis of the posterior compartment.经阴道超声与双重对比钡灌肠检查在后盆腔深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症诊断中的比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):466-71. doi: 10.1002/uog.9072.
4
Computed tomographic colonography vs rectal water- contrast transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: a pilot study.计算机断层结肠成像与直肠水造影经阴道超声检查在直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症诊断中的应用:一项初步研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;49(4):515-523. doi: 10.1002/uog.15905.
5
Transvaginal ultrasonography combined with water-contrast in the rectum in the diagnosis of rectovaginal endometriosis infiltrating the bowel.经阴道超声联合直肠水造影在诊断浸润肠道的直肠阴道子宫内膜异位症中的应用
Fertil Steril. 2008 Mar;89(3):699-700. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1336. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
6
Does transvaginal ultrasonography combined with water-contrast in the rectum aid in the diagnosis of rectovaginal endometriosis infiltrating the bowel?经阴道超声检查联合直肠水造影对浸润肠管的直肠阴道内异症的诊断有帮助吗?
Hum Reprod. 2008 May;23(5):1069-75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den057. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
7
Rectal water contrast transvaginal ultrasound versus double-contrast barium enema in the diagnosis of bowel endometriosis.直肠水造影经阴道超声与双重对比钡灌肠在肠道子宫内膜异位症诊断中的应用比较
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 7;7(9):e017216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017216.
8
Transvaginal sonography with vs without bowel preparation in diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: prospective study.经阴道超声检查加或不加肠道准备对直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症的诊断价值:前瞻性研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;53(3):402-409. doi: 10.1002/uog.19194. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
9
A prospective study comparing rectal water contrast-transvaginal ultrasonography with sonovaginography for the diagnosis of deep posterior endometriosis.一项比较直肠注水经阴道超声与经阴道超声诊断深部后位子宫内膜异位症的前瞻性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Sep;100(9):1700-1711. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14209. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
10
Multidetector computerized tomography enteroclysis vs. rectal water contrast transvaginal ultrasonography in determining the presence and extent of bowel endometriosis.多排计算机断层扫描肠造影术与直肠水对比经阴道超声检查在确定肠子宫内膜异位症的存在和程度方面的比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;37(5):603-13. doi: 10.1002/uog.8971. Epub 2011 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Endometriosis Predictive Models Based on Self-Assessment Questionnaire, Evidence from Clinical Examination or Imaging Findings: A Narrative Review.基于自我评估问卷、临床检查证据或影像学检查结果的子宫内膜异位症预测模型:一项叙述性综述。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 8;13(2):356. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020356.
2
Transvaginal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Endometriosis-An Overview: How, Why, and When.经阴道超声在子宫内膜异位症诊断与评估中的概述:如何、为何及何时应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;12(12):2912. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122912.
3
Meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the optimal imaging modality for the detection of uterosacral ligaments/torus uterinus, rectovaginal septum and vaginal deep endometriosis.
Meta分析和系统评价以确定检测子宫骶韧带/子宫隆凸、直肠阴道隔和阴道深部子宫内膜异位症的最佳成像方式。
Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Nov 4;2021(4):hoab041. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoab041. eCollection 2021.
4
"The Sword in the Stone": radical excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel shaving-a single-centre experience on 703 consecutive patients.《石中剑》:采用肠壁削除术根治性切除深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症——703例连续患者的单中心经验
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3418-3431. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08663-z. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
5
Evaluation of preoperative prediction of intestinal invasion in patients with ovarian cancer.评估卵巢癌患者术前肠道侵犯的预测。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jun;153(3):398-404. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13492. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
6
Comparison of physical examination, ultrasound techniques and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.体格检查、超声技术和磁共振成像在诊断深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症中的比较:诊断准确性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Oct;20(4):3208-3220. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9043. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
7
Bowel Endometriosis: Current Perspectives on Diagnosis and Treatment.肠道子宫内膜异位症:诊断与治疗的当前观点
Int J Womens Health. 2020 Jan 29;12:35-47. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S190326. eCollection 2020.
8
Imaging Modalities for Diagnosis of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis: Comparison between Trans-Vaginal Sonography, Rectal Endoscopy Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. A Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis.诊断深部盆腔子宫内膜异位症的影像学方法:经阴道超声、直肠内镜超声与磁共振成像的比较。一项直接对比的荟萃分析。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Dec 17;9(4):225. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9040225.
9
Preoperative rectosigmoid endoscopic ultrasonography predicts the need for bowel resection in endometriosis.术前直肠乙状结肠镜超声检查可预测子宫内膜异位症是否需要肠切除术。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 14;25(6):696-706. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i6.696.
10
Ultrasound findings in extragenital endometriosis.生殖器外子宫内膜异位症的超声表现
J Ultrason. 2018;18(74):247-254. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2018.0036.