• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症预后的预测:急性生理学及慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)预后评分系统的现状

Predicting outcome in critical care: the current status of the APACHE prognostic scoring system.

作者信息

Wong D T, Knaus W A

机构信息

Department of ICU Research, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20037.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1991 Apr;38(3):374-83. doi: 10.1007/BF03007629.

DOI:10.1007/BF03007629
PMID:2036699
Abstract

The APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) prognostic scoring system was developed in 1981 at the George Washington University Medical Center as a way to measure disease severity. APACHE II, introduced in 1985, was a simplified modification of the original APACHE. The APACHE II score consisted of three parts: 12 acute physiological variables, age and chronic health status. Probability of death can be derived by using the disease category and the APACHE II score. The uses of APACHE II include risk stratification to account for case mix in clinical studies, comparison of the quality of care among ICUs, and assessment of group and individual prognoses. APACHE III, a refinement of APACHE II, will be introduced in late 1990. The APACHE III data base includes 17,457 patients from a representative sample of 40 American hospitals. Additional potential uses of APACHE III include the identification of factors in the ICU which contribute to outcome and assistance in individual patient decision-making. This article reviews the development, current uses and potential applications of the APACHE system.

摘要

急性生理与慢性健康评估(APACHE)预后评分系统于1981年由乔治·华盛顿大学医学中心开发,作为一种衡量疾病严重程度的方法。1985年推出的APACHE II是对原始APACHE的简化改进。APACHE II评分由三部分组成:12个急性生理变量、年龄和慢性健康状况。死亡概率可通过疾病类别和APACHE II评分得出。APACHE II的用途包括在临床研究中进行风险分层以考虑病例组合、比较重症监护病房(ICU)之间的护理质量以及评估群体和个体预后。APACHE III是APACHE II的改进版本,将于1990年末推出。APACHE III数据库包括来自美国40家医院代表性样本的17457名患者。APACHE III的其他潜在用途包括识别ICU中影响预后的因素以及协助个体患者决策。本文回顾了APACHE系统的发展、当前用途和潜在应用。

相似文献

1
Predicting outcome in critical care: the current status of the APACHE prognostic scoring system.危重症预后的预测:急性生理学及慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)预后评分系统的现状
Can J Anaesth. 1991 Apr;38(3):374-83. doi: 10.1007/BF03007629.
2
Rating the quality of intensive care units: is it a function of the intensive care unit scoring system?评估重症监护病房的质量:这是重症监护病房评分系统的一项功能吗?
Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep;30(9):1976-82. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200209000-00005.
3
Evaluation of predictive ability of APACHE II system and hospital outcome in Canadian intensive care unit patients.评估APACHE II系统对加拿大重症监护病房患者的预测能力及医院治疗结果。
Crit Care Med. 1995 Jul;23(7):1177-83. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199507000-00005.
4
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Glasgow coma scores as predictors of outcome from intensive care after cardiac arrest.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)及格拉斯哥昏迷评分作为心脏骤停后重症监护结局的预测指标。
Crit Care Med. 1991 Dec;19(12):1465-73. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199112000-00005.
5
[Prognostic scores in intensive care].[重症监护中的预后评分]
Anaesthesist. 1997 Jun;46(6):471-80. doi: 10.1007/s001010050426.
6
Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in an intensive care unit than general gravity scores?与一般病情严重程度评分相比,特定的肿瘤学评分系统在预测入住重症监护病房并出现急性医疗并发症的癌症患者的预后方面是否更具优势?
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Apr;12(4):234-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0580-3. Epub 2004 Jan 23.
7
Impact of exclusion criteria on case mix, outcome, and length of stay for the severity of disease scoring methods in common use in critical care.排除标准对重症监护中常用疾病严重程度评分方法的病例组合、结局及住院时间的影响。
J Crit Care. 2004 Jun;19(2):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.04.008.
8
Predicting patient outcome from acute renal failure comparing three general severity of illness scoring systems.比较三种通用疾病严重程度评分系统对急性肾衰竭患者预后的预测
Kidney Int. 2000 Jul;58(1):283-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00164.x.
9
Effectiveness of the sequential organ failure assessment, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, and simplified acute physiology score II prognostic scoring systems in paraquat-poisoned patients in the intensive care unit.序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II及简化急性生理学评分系统II在重症监护病房百草枯中毒患者中的预后评分系统的有效性。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017 May;36(5):431-437. doi: 10.1177/0960327116657602. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
10
Assessment of the performance of five intensive care scoring models within a large Scottish database.在一个大型苏格兰数据库中对五种重症监护评分模型的性能评估。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jun;28(6):1820-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00023.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the CAMUS Intra- and Postoperative Risk and Difficulty Estimation Indices Risk Prediction Tool for Estimating Peri- and Postoperative Outcomes, Including Surgical Difficulty, in Major Urological Surgery-A Protocol for a Delphi Study.开发用于估计大泌尿外科手术围手术期和术后结果(包括手术难度)的CAMUS术中及术后风险和难度评估指数风险预测工具——一项德尔菲研究方案
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Apr 28;76:23-37. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.04.002. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Risk Prediction Tools for Estimating Surgical Difficulty and Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes Including Morbidity for Major Urological Surgery: A Concept for the Future of Surgical Planning.用于评估重大泌尿外科手术难度、围手术期及术后结果(包括发病率)的风险预测工具:外科手术规划未来的一个概念
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Apr 7;75:55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.03.012. eCollection 2025 May.
3

本文引用的文献

1
APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.APACHE——急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估:一种基于生理学的分类系统。
Crit Care Med. 1981 Aug;9(8):591-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198108000-00008.
2
The value of measuring severity of disease in clinical research on acutely ill patients.
J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(6):455-63. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90029-8.
3
Prognosis in acute organ-system failure.急性器官系统衰竭的预后。
Ann Surg. 1985 Dec;202(6):685-93. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198512000-00004.
Risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients with cardiac surgery.心脏手术后患者术后谵妄的风险因素。
Sci Prog. 2024 Jul-Sep;107(3):368504241266362. doi: 10.1177/00368504241266362.
4
Importance of qSOFA Score in Terms of Prognosis and Mortality in Critical Care Patients.qSOFA评分在危重症患者预后和死亡率方面的重要性。
Yonago Acta Med. 2024 Aug 27;67(3):225-232. doi: 10.33160/yam.2024.08.009. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Association of ratios of visceral fat area/subcutaneous fat area and muscle area/standard body weight at T12 CT level with the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome.T12 CT水平下内脏脂肪面积/皮下脂肪面积与肌肉面积/标准体重比值与急性呼吸窘迫综合征预后的相关性
Chin Med J Pulm Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 20;2(2):106-118. doi: 10.1016/j.pccm.2024.05.004. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Diagnostic utility of HFLC% and IG% for acute Pancreatitis-A retrospective Case-Control study.HFLC%和IG%对急性胰腺炎的诊断效用——一项回顾性病例对照研究
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 23;10(9):e30031. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30031. eCollection 2024 May 15.
7
Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review.血浆白蛋白在预后指标中的作用解读:文献综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 22;12(19):6132. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196132.
8
Expression level of serum miR-374a-5p in patients with acute pancreatitis and its effect on viability, apoptosis, and inflammatory factors of pancreatic acinar cells induced by cerulein.血清 miR-374a-5p 在急性胰腺炎患者中的表达水平及其对 cerulein 诱导的胰腺腺泡细胞活力、凋亡和炎症因子的影响。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2023 Jun;39(6):616-623. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12666. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
9
Outcome and prognostic markers of cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients admitted to a hepatology ICU in a tertiary care university hospital.在一家三级护理大学医院的肝病 ICU 住院的肝硬化和非肝硬化患者的预后和预后标志物。
Afr Health Sci. 2022 Jun;22(2):377-383. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v22i2.43.
10
Comparative Analysis of Composite Mortality Prediction Scores in Intensive Care Burn Patients.重症烧伤患者复合死亡率预测评分的比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12321. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912321.
4
Profile of medical ICU vs. ward patients in an acute care hospital.
Crit Care Med. 1985 May;13(5):381-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198505000-00002.
5
Surgical infection stratification system for intra-abdominal infection. Multicenter trial.腹腔内感染的手术感染分层系统。多中心试验。
Arch Surg. 1985 Jan;120(1):21-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390250015003.
6
Operative vs percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses. Comparison of morbidity and mortality.
Arch Surg. 1986 Feb;121(2):141-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400020027001.
7
An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers.大型医疗中心重症监护结果评估。
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Mar;104(3):410-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-3-410.
8
APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II:一种疾病严重程度分类系统。
Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29.
9
Predicting and evaluating patient outcomes.
Ann Intern Med. 1988 Oct 1;109(7):521-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-109-7-521.
10
Treatment of severe intra-abdominal sepsis and/or necrotic foci by an 'open-abdomen' approach. Zipper and zipper-mesh techniques.
Arch Surg. 1988 Feb;123(2):152-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400260032002.