Lluita contra SIDA Foundation, Institut de Recerca en Ciències de Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 May 1;50(9):1300-8. doi: 10.1086/651689.
Although antiretroviral therapy improves immune response, some human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients present unsatisfactory CD4 T cell recovery despite achieving viral suppression, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality.
Cross-sectional, case-control study to characterize the mechanism and to identify predictive factors of poor immune response. We included 230 patients who were receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy and who had a viral load <50 copies/mL for >2 years; 95 were "discordant" (case patients; CD4 T cell count always <350 cells/microL), and 135 were "concordant" (control subjects). Activation markers, CD4 T cell death (necrosis, intrinsic apoptosis, and extrinsic apoptosis), and caspase-3 were measured. Clinical parameters, particularly antiretroviral combinations, were correlated with immune recovery.
Discordant patients showed higher levels of activation markers, mainly in CD4 T cells (p < .001), and higher rates of spontaneous cell death (P < .001). Rates of activation and rates of CD4 T cell death (mainly by intrinsic apoptosis) were the best predictive factors for immune recovery, along with nadir CD4 T cell count. Patients who were receiving a protease inhibitor-based regimen were more likely to be discordant and showed higher rates of activation (P= .011), higher rates of CD4 T cell death (P = .033), and a lower nadir CD4 T cell count (P < .001). Multivariate analysis, however, ruled out any effect of protease inhibitors on immune recovery. No differences were observed between the use of tenofovir-emtricitabine (Truvada) and the use of abacavir-lamivudine (Kivexa).
CD4 T cell apoptosis by the intrinsic pathway represents the determinant mechanism of the unsatisfactory immune recovery and should be targeted to manage therapy for discordant patients. The predictive value of low nadir CD4 T cell count for a poor immune recovery led us to consider starting antiretroviral therapy earlier. No differences were observed among antiretrovirals in terms of immune recovery.
尽管抗逆转录病毒疗法可改善免疫应答,但一些人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者尽管病毒得到抑制,但 CD4 T 细胞的恢复仍不理想,导致发病率和死亡率增加。
这是一项横断面、病例对照研究,旨在确定不良免疫应答的机制和预测因素。我们纳入了 230 例正在接受高效抗逆转录病毒治疗且病毒载量<50 拷贝/mL 持续>2 年的患者;95 例为“不一致”(病例组;CD4 T 细胞计数始终<350 个/μL),135 例为“一致”(对照组)。检测激活标志物、CD4 T 细胞死亡(坏死、内在凋亡和外在凋亡)和半胱氨酸天冬氨酸蛋白酶-3。临床参数,特别是抗逆转录病毒联合用药,与免疫恢复相关。
不一致患者的激活标志物水平更高,主要是 CD4 T 细胞(P<0.001),且自发细胞死亡率更高(P<0.001)。激活率和 CD4 T 细胞死亡率(主要通过内在凋亡)是免疫恢复的最佳预测因素,与 CD4 T 细胞最低点计数相关。接受蛋白酶抑制剂为基础的治疗方案的患者更可能不一致,表现出更高的激活率(P=0.011)、更高的 CD4 T 细胞死亡率(P=0.033)和更低的 CD4 T 细胞最低点计数(P<0.001)。然而,多变量分析排除了蛋白酶抑制剂对免疫恢复的任何影响。使用替诺福韦-恩曲他滨(Truvada)和使用阿巴卡韦-拉米夫定(Kivexa)之间无差异。
内在途径的 CD4 T 细胞凋亡是免疫恢复不理想的决定机制,应针对该机制治疗不一致的患者。CD4 T 细胞最低点计数低对免疫恢复不良的预测价值促使我们考虑更早开始抗逆转录病毒治疗。在免疫恢复方面,各种抗逆转录病毒药物之间无差异。