Suppr超能文献

风险图形中“少即是多”的演示。

A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics.

机构信息

VA Health Services Research & Development Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(6):661-71. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364244. Epub 2010 Apr 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online tools such as Adjuvant! provide tailored estimates of the possible outcomes of adjuvant therapy options available to breast cancer patients. The graphical format typically displays 4 outcomes simultaneously: survival, mortality due to cancer, other-cause mortality, and incremental survival due to adjuvant treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether simpler formats that present only baseline and incremental survival would improve comprehension of the relevant risk statistics and/or affect treatment intentions.

DESIGN

. Randomized experimental manipulation of risk graphics shown included in Internet-administered survey vignettes about adjuvant therapy decisions for breast cancer patients with ER + tumors.

PARTICIPANTS

Demographically diverse, stratified random samples of women ages 40 to 74 y recruited from an Internet research panel.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomized to view either pictographs (icon arrays) that displayed all 4 possible outcomes or pictographs that showed only survival outcomes.

MEASUREMENTS

Comprehension of key statistics, task completion times, graph evaluation ratings, and perceived interest in adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In the primary study (N = 832), participants who viewed survival-only pictographs had better accuracy when reporting the total chance of survival with both chemotherapy and hormonal therapy (63% v. 50%, P < 0.001), higher graph evaluation ratings (x = 7.98 v. 7.67, P = 0.04), and less interest in adding chemotherapy to hormonal therapy (43% v. 50%, P = 0.04; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.68, P = 0.008). A replication study (N = 714) confirmed that participants who viewed survival-only graphs had higher graph evaluation ratings (x = 8.06 v. 7.72, P = 0.04) and reduced interest in chemotherapy (OR=0.67,P=0.03).

LIMITATIONS

Studies used general public samples; actual patients may process risk information differently.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking a ''less is more'' approach by omitting redundant mortality outcome statistics can be an effective method of risk communication and may be preferable when using visual formats such as pictographs.

摘要

背景

在线工具,如 Adjuvant!,为乳腺癌患者提供了各种辅助治疗方案可能结果的定制化评估。图形格式通常同时显示 4 种结果:生存、癌症相关死亡率、其他原因死亡率和辅助治疗带来的增量生存。

目的

测试更简单的格式,仅呈现基线和增量生存,是否会提高对相关风险统计数据的理解,或者是否会影响治疗意向。

设计

在关于乳腺癌患者 ER+肿瘤辅助治疗决策的互联网调查小案例中,对在线呈现的风险图形进行随机实验操作。

参与者

从互联网研究小组中招募了年龄在 40 岁至 74 岁之间的、具有不同人口统计学特征的分层随机女性样本。

干预措施

参与者被随机分配观看显示所有 4 种可能结果的图表(图标数组)或仅显示生存结果的图表。

测量

关键统计数据的理解、任务完成时间、图表评估评分和对辅助化疗的兴趣。

结果

在主要研究(N=832)中,观看仅生存图表的参与者在报告化疗和激素治疗的总生存机会时更准确(63%比 50%,P<0.001),对图表的评估评分更高(x=7.98 比 7.67,P=0.04),对将化疗添加到激素治疗中的兴趣降低(43%比 50%,P=0.04;调整后的优势比[OR]为 0.68,P=0.008)。一项复制研究(N=714)证实,观看仅生存图表的参与者对图表的评估评分更高(x=8.06 比 7.72,P=0.04),对化疗的兴趣降低(OR=0.67,P=0.03)。

局限性

研究使用了普通公众样本;实际患者可能会以不同的方式处理风险信息。

结论

通过省略冗余的死亡率统计数据,采用“少即是多”的方法是一种有效的风险沟通方法,在使用图表等视觉格式时可能更可取。

相似文献

1
A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics.
Med Decis Making. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(6):661-71. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364244. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
2
Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics.
Cancer. 2008 Dec 15;113(12):3382-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23959.
4
5
The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug;129(1):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1193-4. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
6
Animated graphics for comparing two risks: a cautionary tale.
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jul 25;14(4):e106. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2030.
7
Mortality versus survival graphs: improving temporal consistency in perceptions of treatment effectiveness.
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.013. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
9
Cool but counterproductive: interactive, Web-based risk communications can backfire.
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Aug 25;13(3):e60. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1665.
10
A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients-A web-based randomized controlled trial.
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):797-804. doi: 10.1111/hex.12522. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

2
Research Participant Interest in Learning Results of Biomarker Tests for Alzheimer Disease.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e252919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2919.
3
Scope, Methods, and Overview Findings for the Making Numbers Meaningful Evidence Review of Communicating Probabilities in Health: A Systematic Review.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255334. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255334. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
4
How Point (Single-Probability) Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 1: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255333. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255333. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
5
How Synthesis Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241293796. doi: 10.1177/23814683241293796. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
6
How Difference Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 1: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241294077. doi: 10.1177/23814683241294077. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
7
Perceived usability and acceptability of the My-Hip Fracture risk communication tool from the perspective of academic clinicians.
PEC Innov. 2024 Nov 26;5:100360. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100360. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics.
Cancer. 2008 Dec 15;113(12):3382-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23959.
2
Risk communication with patients with breast cancer: cautionary notes about printing Adjuvant! estimates.
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Jul;9(7):602-3. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70158-X.
5
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):663-71. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07303824. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
6
Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):672-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07304449. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
7
Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers.
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Apr;64(2):169-90. doi: 10.1177/10775587070640020301.
8
Reducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2007 Mar;13(1):11-21. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.13.1.11.
9
Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: judgments of gist in treatment decisions.
Med Decis Making. 2007 Jan-Feb;27(1):34-43. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06297101.
10
A decision aid to assist in adjuvant therapy choices for breast cancer.
Psychooncology. 2006 Nov;15(11):1001-13. doi: 10.1002/pon.1040.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验