Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 1;5(4):e9946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009946.
There is insufficient evidence whether the benefit of adding angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors outweighs the increased risk of adverse effects in patients with heart failure.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Two independent reviewers searched and abstracted randomized controlled trials of ARBs and ACE inhibitors compared to ACE inhibitor therapy alone in patients with heart failure reporting mortality and hospitalizations having a follow-up of at least 6 months identified by a systematic literature search. Eight trials including a total of 18,061 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. There was no difference between patients treated with combination therapy and ACE inhibitor therapy alone for overall mortality, hospitalization for any reason, fatal or nonfatal MI. Combination therapy was, however, associated with fewer hospital admissions for heart failure (RR 0.81, 95%CI 0.72-0.91), although there was significant heterogeneity across trials (p-value for heterogeneity = 0.04; I(2) = 57% [95%CI 0-83%]). Patients treated with combination therapy had a higher risk of worsening renal function and symptomatic hypotension, and their trial medications were more often permanently discontinued. Lack of individual patient data precluded the analysis of time-to-event data and identification of subgroups which potentially benefit more from combination therapy such as younger patients with preserved renal function and thus at lower risk to experience worsening renal function or hyperkalemia.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Combination therapy with ARBs and ACE inhibitors reduces admissions for heart failure in patients with congestive heart failure when compared to ACE inhibitor therapy alone, but does not reduce overall mortality or all-cause hospitalization and is associated with more adverse events. Thus, based on current evidence, combination therapy with ARBs and ACE inhibitors may be reserved for patients who remain symptomatic on therapy with ACE inhibitors under strict monitoring for any signs of worsening renal function and/or symptomatic hypotension.
在心力衰竭患者中,将血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂 (ARB) 与血管紧张素转换酶 (ACE) 抑制剂联合使用的益处是否超过不良反应风险增加,目前尚无足够的证据。
方法/主要发现:两名独立评审员通过系统文献检索,检索并提取了 ARB 和 ACE 抑制剂与 ACE 抑制剂单药治疗相比,在报告死亡率和住院率的心力衰竭患者中进行的随机对照试验,并对至少随访 6 个月的患者进行了摘要。八项试验共纳入 18061 名患者,符合我们的纳入标准。与 ACE 抑制剂单药治疗相比,联合治疗组患者的总死亡率、因任何原因导致的住院率、致命性或非致命性心肌梗死发生率无差异。然而,联合治疗组心力衰竭住院人数减少(RR 0.81,95%CI 0.72-0.91),尽管各试验之间存在显著异质性(异质性检验 p 值=0.04;I²=57%[95%CI 0-83%])。联合治疗组患者肾功能恶化和症状性低血压的风险较高,且其试验药物更常被永久停用。由于缺乏个体患者数据,无法对时间事件数据进行分析,也无法确定哪些亚组可能从联合治疗中获益更多,如肾功能保存良好的年轻患者,这些患者发生肾功能恶化或高钾血症的风险较低。
结论/意义:与 ACE 抑制剂单药治疗相比,ARB 和 ACE 抑制剂联合治疗可减少充血性心力衰竭患者的心力衰竭住院次数,但不能降低总死亡率或全因住院率,且与更多的不良事件相关。因此,根据现有证据,ARB 和 ACE 抑制剂联合治疗可能仅限于对 ACE 抑制剂治疗仍有症状的患者,同时应在严格监测肾功能恶化和/或症状性低血压等任何迹象的情况下进行。