Demers Catherine, Mody Anita, Teo Koon K, McKelvie Robert S
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005;5(6):351-9. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200505060-00002.
ACE inhibitors have significantly decreased cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) in patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Furthermore, the extended 12-year study of the SOLVD (Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction) Prevention and Treatment trials (X-SOLVD) demonstrated a significant benefit with a reduction of cumulative all-cause death compared with placebo (50.9% vs 56.4%) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86; 95% CI 0.79, 0.93; p < 0.001]. The survival benefits and significant reductions in cardiovascular morbidity related to treatment with ACE inhibitors are likely achieved by titrating the dose of ACE inhibitors to the target dose achieved in clinical trials. Although the ATLAS (Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril And Survival) study, which randomly allocated HF patients to low- or high-dose lisinopril, showed no significant difference between groups for the primary outcome of all-cause mortality (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.82, 1.03), the predetermined secondary combined outcome of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization was reduced by 15% for the patients receiving high-dose lisinopril compared with low-dose (p < 0.001) with a 24% reduction in HF hospitalization (p = 0.002). Despite the use of ACE inhibitors, blockade of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) remains incomplete, with evidence of continued production of angiotensin II by non-ACE-dependent pathways. The safety and potential benefits of angiotensin receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) in patients with impaired systolic function have been assessed in moderate to large clinical trials. In patients with impaired LV systolic function and HF, combination therapy with ARBs with recommended HF therapy including ACE inhibitors in patients who remain symptomatic may be considered for its morbidity benefit. Based on the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity)-Added data, candesartan cilexetil in addition to standard HF therapy results in a further reduction of cardiovascular mortality. Close monitoring of renal function and serum potassium levels is needed in this setting. The VALIANT (VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarction Trial) results suggest that valsartan is as effective as captopril in patients following an acute MI with HF and/or LV systolic dysfunction and may be used as an alternative treatment in ACE inhibitor-intolerant patients. There was no survival benefit with valsartan-captopril combination compared with captopril alone in this trial. Despite these results, ACE inhibitors remain the first-choice therapeutic agent in post-MI patients, and ARBs can be used in patients with clear intolerance. Although the use of ACE inhibitors may be appealing in patients with HF and preserved LV systolic function, there is currently no evidence from large clinical trials to support this.
血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂已显著降低了无症状或有症状的左心室(LV)收缩功能障碍患者的心血管死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)以及因心力衰竭(HF)住院的发生率。此外,对左心室功能障碍研究(SOLVD)预防和治疗试验的12年扩展研究(X-SOLVD)表明,与安慰剂相比,累积全因死亡显著降低(50.9%对56.4%)[风险比(HR)0.86;95%置信区间(CI)0.79,0.93;p<0.001]。与ACE抑制剂治疗相关的生存益处和心血管发病率的显著降低可能是通过将ACE抑制剂剂量滴定至临床试验中达到的目标剂量来实现的。尽管赖诺普利治疗评估与生存(ATLAS)研究将HF患者随机分为低剂量或高剂量赖诺普利组,但在全因死亡率的主要结局方面,两组之间无显著差异(HR 0.92;95%CI 0.82,1.03),与低剂量组相比,接受高剂量赖诺普利的患者全因死亡率和HF住院的预定次要联合结局降低了15%(p<0.001),HF住院率降低了24%(p = 0.002)。尽管使用了ACE抑制剂,但肾素血管紧张素醛固酮系统(RAAS)的阻断仍不完全,有证据表明非ACE依赖途径持续产生血管紧张素II。血管紧张素受体拮抗剂(血管紧张素受体阻滞剂[ARBs])在收缩功能受损患者中的安全性和潜在益处已在中度至大型临床试验中进行了评估。在LV收缩功能受损和HF患者中,对于仍有症状的患者,可考虑将ARBs与推荐的HF治疗(包括ACE抑制剂)联合使用,以获得发病率方面的益处。基于心力衰竭中坎地沙坦:死亡率和发病率降低评估(CHARM)-添加数据,坎地沙坦酯除标准HF治疗外,还可进一步降低心血管死亡率。在此情况下,需要密切监测肾功能和血清钾水平。缬沙坦急性心肌梗死试验(VALIANT)结果表明,在急性MI后合并HF和/或LV收缩功能障碍的患者中缬沙坦与卡托普利效果相当,并且可用于不耐受ACE抑制剂的患者。在该试验中,缬沙坦-卡托普利联合用药与单独使用卡托普利相比,无生存益处。尽管有这些结果,ACE抑制剂仍然是MI后患者的首选治疗药物,ARBs可用于明确不耐受的患者。尽管ACE抑制剂的使用在LV收缩功能保留的HF患者中可能具有吸引力,但目前尚无大型临床试验证据支持这一点。