我们希望对文献计量研究指标展开更专业的辩论。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

[We wish more professional debate about the bibliometric research indicators].

作者信息

Søndergaard Jørgen, Mouritzen Poul Erik, Olesen Søren Peter, Molin Søren, Fink Hans, Blaabjerg Frede, Sivertsen Gunnar

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 Mar 22;172(12):984; author reply 984.

PMID:20376986

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

[We wish more professional debate about the bibliometric research indicators].

Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 Mar 22;172(12):984; author reply 984.

New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation.

Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009 Jan-Feb;57(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5. Epub 2009 Feb 14.

[Result-based financing of medical research].

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 Mar 26;129(7):638-41. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.08.0362.

Impact factor rises again.

Brain Res Bull. 2004 Dec 15;64(4):285-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2004.07.012.

Is the journal impact factor a valid indicator of scientific value?

Singapore Med J. 2009 Aug;50(8):749-51.

Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities.

Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005 Nov;97(5):261-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x.

The positive and negative impacts, and dangers of the impact factor.

Community Dent Health. 2007 Sep;24(3):130-4.

Assessing prevention research impact: a bibliometric analysis.

Am J Prev Med. 2006 Mar;30(3):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.025.

What happens to our ideas? A bibliometric analysis of articles in social work in health care in the 1990s.

Soc Work Health Care. 2005;41(3-4):35-66. doi: 10.1300/J010v41n03_02.

[New bibliometric indicators. Is this the end of the impact factor era?].

Magy Onkol. 2009 Jun;53(2):115-25. doi: 10.1556/MOnkol.53.2009.2.3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

[We wish more professional debate about the bibliometric research indicators].

Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 Mar 22;172(12):984; author reply 984.

New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation.

Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009 Jan-Feb;57(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5. Epub 2009 Feb 14.

[Result-based financing of medical research].

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 Mar 26;129(7):638-41. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.08.0362.

Impact factor rises again.

Brain Res Bull. 2004 Dec 15;64(4):285-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2004.07.012.

Is the journal impact factor a valid indicator of scientific value?

Singapore Med J. 2009 Aug;50(8):749-51.

Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities.

Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005 Nov;97(5):261-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x.

The positive and negative impacts, and dangers of the impact factor.

Community Dent Health. 2007 Sep;24(3):130-4.

Assessing prevention research impact: a bibliometric analysis.

Am J Prev Med. 2006 Mar;30(3):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.025.

What happens to our ideas? A bibliometric analysis of articles in social work in health care in the 1990s.

Soc Work Health Care. 2005;41(3-4):35-66. doi: 10.1300/J010v41n03_02.

[New bibliometric indicators. Is this the end of the impact factor era?].

Magy Onkol. 2009 Jun;53(2):115-25. doi: 10.1556/MOnkol.53.2009.2.3.