• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)在外科重症监护病房预测预后方面的应用经验。

Experience with the APACHE II severity of disease scoring system in predicting outcome in a surgical intensive therapy unit.

作者信息

Edwards A T, Ng K J, Shandall A A, Price-Thomas J M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK.

出版信息

J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1991 Feb;36(1):37-40.

PMID:2037997
Abstract

The APACHE II system, a severity of disease scoring system, has been used to identify intensive therapy unit patients in whom prolonged treatment is unlikely to be beneficial. Fifty-nine surgical patients admitted to the intensive care unit over a 6-month period underwent a single APACHE II scoring in the first 24 h. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 34%. The range of APACHE II scores was 3-29. The survivors had significantly lower scores (mean 11) than those who died (mean 19). Most patients (53%) had a score greater than or equal to 11 to less than or equal to 22 and had an equal chance of living or dying. No patient with a score greater than 22 survived and at this level the APACHE II score was highly specific (100%) but with a very low sensitivity (30%). APACHE II scores greater than 22 may be useful as an adjunct to a clinical decision to withhold treatment, but scores below that level lack the specificity and sensitivity to be of any value.

摘要

急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)是一种疾病严重程度评分系统,已被用于识别那些延长治疗可能无益处的重症监护病房患者。在6个月的时间里,59名入住重症监护病房的外科患者在最初24小时内接受了一次APACHE II评分。30天的总体死亡率为34%。APACHE II评分范围为3 - 29分。幸存者的评分(平均11分)显著低于死亡者(平均19分)。大多数患者(53%)的评分大于或等于11分且小于或等于22分,其存活或死亡的几率相等。评分大于22分的患者无一存活,在此水平上,APACHE II评分具有高度特异性(100%),但敏感性非常低(30%)。大于22分的APACHE II评分可作为停止治疗临床决策的辅助手段,但低于该水平的评分缺乏特异性和敏感性,无任何价值。

相似文献

1
Experience with the APACHE II severity of disease scoring system in predicting outcome in a surgical intensive therapy unit.急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)在外科重症监护病房预测预后方面的应用经验。
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1991 Feb;36(1):37-40.
2
Acute pancreatitis in intensive care unit patients: value of clinical and radiologic prognosticators at predicting clinical course and outcome.重症监护病房患者的急性胰腺炎:临床和影像学预后指标对预测临床病程及结局的价值
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1026-30. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000049951.77583.85.
3
Validation of APACHE II score in a surgical intensive care unit.
Singapore Med J. 1993 Aug;34(4):322-4.
4
Readmission to surgical intensive care increases severity-adjusted patient mortality.再次入住外科重症监护病房会增加经病情严重程度调整后的患者死亡率。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):1027-31. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000218217.42861.b7.
5
[The Heidelberg Intensive Care Unit Score. Development of a computer-assisted scoring system for documentation of treatment course and assessment of prognosis in surgical intensive care patients].[海德堡重症监护病房评分。一种用于记录手术重症监护患者治疗过程和评估预后的计算机辅助评分系统的开发]
Chirurg. 1995 May;66(5):513-8.
6
The outcome of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE: model application, sensitivity, and predictability.根据RIFLE标准评估重症监护病房中急性肾衰竭的预后:模型应用、敏感性及可预测性
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Dec;46(6):1038-48. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.08.033.
7
Evaluation of the APACHE II scoring system in an Israeli intensive care unit.以色列重症监护病房中急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)的评估。
Isr J Med Sci. 1994 Jul;30(7):514-20.
8
[Application of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score system to patients with infection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in lower respiratory tract in intensive care unit].急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II评分系统在重症监护病房铜绿假单胞菌下呼吸道感染患者中的应用
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2003 Nov;15(11):662-5.
9
Complicated acute myocardial infarction requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: prognostic factors of clinical outcome in a series of 157 patients.重症监护病房中需要机械通气的复杂急性心肌梗死:157例患者临床结局的预后因素
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):100-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000098605.58349.76.
10
Predictors of mortality in a medical intensive care unit.医学重症监护病房的死亡率预测因素
Natl Med J India. 1997 Nov-Dec;10(6):270-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Mortality in Medical ICU Patients: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Center in Jordan.约旦一家三级医疗中心内科重症监护病房患者死亡率的预测因素:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 7;14(12):4039. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124039.
2
Clinical review: Outreach - a strategy for improving the care of the acutely ill hospitalized patient.临床综述:外展服务——改善急性病住院患者护理的一种策略。
Crit Care. 2004 Feb;8(1):33-40. doi: 10.1186/cc2377. Epub 2003 Oct 6.
3
Comparative vascular audit using the POSSUM scoring system.使用POSSUM评分系统进行的血管对比审计。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 May;75(3):175-7.