Department of Ophthalmology, Ospedale Policlinico di Monza, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1256-1264.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.024. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
To assess the diagnostic validity of morphometric examination of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness to detect permanent structural changes after retrobulbar optic neuritis (ON).
Evaluation of a diagnostic test.
Twenty-five patients with a history of retrobulbar ON and 29 disease-free controls.
The optic discs were evaluated by means of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph [HRT III]), and RNFL thickness by means of scanning laser polarimetry (GDx), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Vision function was assessed in all subjects by testing visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color vision, visual field (VF), and visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Statistical comparisons were made between the affected (ON) and unaffected eyes (non-ON) of the patients with ON, and between these eyes and control eyes (Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon's test). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and sensitivity and specificity in discriminating ON from control eyes, were calculated for the significant parameters. Correlations between the tests were calculated by means of Spearman's correlation coefficient.
We compared OCT, GDx, HRT, and visual testing results in ON eyes versus control eyes.
All of the visual function test parameters and RNFL thickness (GDx and OCT) were significantly different between the ON eyes and both the non-ON and control eyes (P<0.01), and there were significant differences in some GDx parameters between the non-ON and control eyes. There were no significant differences in the HRT parameters. The ROC curves indicated that the greatest diagnostic validity was associated with the GDx nerve fiber indicator (AUC, 0.92; sensitivity, 0.80; specificity, 0.97 using a cutoff point of 20.5 between ON and non-ON eyes), and OCT temporal thickness (AUC, 0.92; sensitivity, 0.72; specificity, 0.95 using a cutoff point of 51.5 microm).
When investigating permanent damage after ON, RNFL thickness is a promising biomarker. The GDx and OCT are reliable, noninvasive, user-friendly devices; both show good diagnostic validity and good correlations with functional tests in discriminating affected from unaffected eyes. Retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in non-ON eyes should be further studied as a possible subclinical indicator of disease.
评估视神经盘形态计量检查和视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度在探测球后视神经炎(ON)后永久性结构改变中的诊断价值。
诊断试验评估。
25 例有球后视神经炎病史的患者和 29 例无病对照者。
使用共焦激光扫描检眼镜(海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪[HRT III])评估视盘,使用扫描激光偏振仪(GDx)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评估 RNFL 厚度。所有受试者的视力功能均通过测试视力、对比敏感度、色觉、视野(VF)和视觉诱发电位(VEPs)进行评估。对 ON 患者的患眼(ON)和未患眼(非 ON)以及这些眼和对照眼之间进行统计学比较(Mann-Whitney 检验和 Wilcoxon 检验)。为有意义的参数计算区分 ON 眼和对照眼的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线及敏感性和特异性。通过 Spearman 相关系数计算各测试之间的相关性。
我们比较了 ON 眼与对照眼的 OCT、GDx、HRT 和视觉检查结果。
所有视觉功能测试参数和 RNFL 厚度(GDx 和 OCT)在 ON 眼与非 ON 眼和对照眼之间均有显著差异(P<0.01),并且在一些 GDx 参数中,非 ON 眼与对照眼之间也有显著差异。HRT 参数无显著差异。ROC 曲线表明,GDx 神经纤维指标(AUC 0.92;敏感性 0.80;特异性 0.97,ON 眼与非 ON 眼的截断值为 20.5)和 OCT 颞侧厚度(AUC 0.92;敏感性 0.72;特异性 0.95,截断值为 51.5μm)的诊断准确性最高。
在研究 ON 后永久性损害时,RNFL 厚度是一种很有前途的生物标志物。GDx 和 OCT 是可靠、无创、易用的设备;在区分患眼和未患眼方面,两者均具有良好的诊断准确性和与功能测试的良好相关性。非 ON 眼的视网膜神经纤维层变薄应作为疾病的亚临床指标进一步研究。