Suppr超能文献

连续或非连续复发性流产:携带者状态有何不同?

Consecutive or non-consecutive recurrent miscarriage: is there any difference in carrier status?

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, H4-205, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2010 Jun;25(6):1411-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq089. Epub 2010 Apr 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carrier status of a structural balanced chromosome abnormality is associated with recurrent miscarriage. There is, at present, no evidence of the impact of the sequence of preceding pregnancies on the probability of carrier status. The aim of our study was therefore to examine whether the history of consecutive versus non-consecutive miscarriages in couples with two or more miscarriages has any impact on the probability of carrying a chromosome abnormality.

METHODS

A nested case-control study was performed in six centres for clinical genetics in the Netherlands. Couples referred for chromosome analysis after two or more miscarriages were included: 279 couples with a carrier of a structural chromosomal abnormality and 428 non-carrier couples who served as controls. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, corrected for known risk factors for carrier status, were performed. The main outcome measure was the probability of carrier status.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-six of 279 (92%) carrier couples and 381 of 428 (89%) non-carrier couples had experienced consecutive miscarriages (P = 0.21). A history of two or three consecutive miscarriages did not alter the probability of carrier status when compared with two [odds ratio (OR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-1.7] or three (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.39-1.3) non-consecutive miscarriages.

CONCLUSIONS

The sequence of preceding pregnancies is not a risk factor for carrier status. Therefore, couples with miscarriages interspersed with healthy child(ren) should be managed the same as couples with consecutive miscarriages regarding chromosome diagnosis.

摘要

背景

携带结构性染色体异常的情况与反复流产有关。目前,没有证据表明先前妊娠的顺序会影响携带异常的概率。因此,我们的研究旨在检查在有两次或两次以上流产史的夫妇中,连续流产与非连续流产的先后顺序是否会影响携带染色体异常的概率。

方法

在荷兰的六个临床遗传学中心进行了一项巢式病例对照研究。纳入了因两次或两次以上流产而接受染色体分析的夫妇:279 对携带结构性染色体异常的夫妇为病例组,428 对非携带者夫妇为对照组。进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,并校正了已知的携带状态风险因素。主要观察指标是携带状态的概率。

结果

279 对携带者夫妇中有 256 对(92%)和 428 对非携带者夫妇中有 381 对(89%)经历了连续流产(P=0.21)。与两次非连续流产相比,两次或三次连续流产并不会改变携带状态的概率[比值比(OR)0.90,95%置信区间(CI)0.48-1.7]或三次非连续流产(OR 0.71,95% CI 0.39-1.3)。

结论

先前妊娠的顺序不是携带状态的风险因素。因此,对于有流产史且其间有健康孩子的夫妇,与连续流产的夫妇相比,在进行染色体诊断时应采取相同的管理方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验