National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jun;66(6):1297-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05245.x. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
This paper is a report of a study identifying psychosocial interventions relevant to routine care and exploring their content critically and analysing patterns in the use of these interventions.
People experiencing enduring and serious mental disorders value psychosocial engagement as a means of achieving recovery and rehabilitation. However, mental health nurses' use of person-centred and directive psychosocial engagement in routine care is unclear, with the potential arising for benevolence and paternalism.
A think aloud study was carried out with 37 mental health nurses responding to a simulated case depicting a person with an enduring mental health problem. Participants were recruited from community and acute hospital facilities across Ireland and responded to two tasks: identifying the nature of the person's problems and recommending what to do next. Transcripts were coded using judgement and intervention themes designed for the purpose. Patterns in the use of psychosocial intervention themes were described and further analysed by level of experience (highly experienced or not) and practice setting (acute/community setting).
A task-oriented psychosocial intervention labelled structured engagement was used extensively, followed by reassurance and encouragement based on pragmatic communication. A minority of nurses used dialogue, representing person-centred care. Highly experienced community mental health nurses were the most likely to talk in terms of intensive psychosocial engagement.
Relying on pragmatic problem-solving is problematic in terms of decision-making transparency and service user involvement. The use of informal knowledge in practice should be negotiated through more open discussion by nurses, including adoption of a consensus on the components of psychosocial care.
本文是一项研究报告,旨在确定与常规护理相关的心理社会干预措施,并对其内容进行批判性分析,同时分析这些干预措施的使用模式。
经历持久和严重精神障碍的人将心理社会参与视为实现康复和恢复的一种手段。然而,精神科护士在常规护理中使用以患者为中心和指导型的心理社会参与的情况并不明确,可能会出现仁慈和家长式作风。
采用出声思维研究法,对来自爱尔兰各地社区和急性医院设施的 37 名精神科护士进行了研究,要求他们对一个描述有持久精神健康问题的人的模拟案例做出回应。参与者完成了两项任务:识别患者问题的性质,并提出下一步的建议。使用针对该目的设计的判断和干预主题对转录本进行编码。描述了心理社会干预主题的使用模式,并按经验水平(经验丰富或不丰富)和实践环境(急性/社区环境)进一步进行分析。
广泛使用了以任务为导向的心理社会干预措施,即结构化参与,其次是基于实用沟通的保证和鼓励。少数护士采用对话,代表以患者为中心的护理。经验丰富的社区精神科护士最有可能进行深入的心理社会参与。
从决策透明度和服务对象参与的角度来看,依赖实用的问题解决方法是有问题的。应通过护士更开放的讨论来协商实践中非正式知识的使用,包括就心理社会护理的组成部分达成共识。